Certificate u/s 197 for lower withholding tax given by AO under dictation of superior officer bad in law

Certificate u/s 197 given by AO under dictation of superior officer bad in law. It’s a quasi-judicial decision has to be taken by the AO on objective criteria and relevant material – High Court

ABCAUS Case Law Citation:
ABCAUS 3093 (2019) (07) HC

Important Case Law relied upon by parties:
Tata Teleservices (Maharashtra) Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax (TDS)
Anirudhsinhji Karsansinhji Jadeja v. State of Gujarat AIR 1995 SC 2390

The assessee had filed a writ petition challenging the “lower withholding certificate‟ issued by the Income Tax Officer under Section 197 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) directing deduction of tax at source (TDS) @ 5% from the payments made to the Petitioner by its Indian customers.

The Hon’ble High Court observed that from the note sheet it was evident that Assessing Officer (AO) had issued the certificate u/s 197 authorising deduction @ 5% at the direction of Commissioner of Income Tax.

The Court opined that there was both arbitrariness and non-application of mind at various levels which vitiates the impugned certificate. No reasons whatsoever had been indicated as to why the CIT felt that the TDS rate should be higher instead of 1% as asked by the Petitioner and the AO mechanically followed the advice of his superior authorities.

The Hon’ble High Court stated that the settled legal position in administrative law is that orders passed by a statutory authority under “dictation” of a superior officer or anyone else is bad in law.

The Hon’ble High Court further observed that Rule 28AA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (Rules) prescribes the procedure to be followed by the AO who is approached with an application under Section 197 (1) of the Act. How the AO is to estimate the “existing and estimated liability” is indicated in Rule 28 AA (2) which were not kept in view. The impugned certificate simply stated that the rate of TDS should be 5%, which obviously did not satisfy the requirements of the law.

The Hon’ble High Court reiterated that decision which is quasi-judicial in nature, has to be taken by the AO under Section 197(1) of the Act on objective criteria and be based on relevant material provided by the applicant and available with the Department. It must be supported by reasons available on the file which conform to the requirement of Section 197 of the Act read with Rule 28 AA of the Rules. Those reasons must be communicated to the applicant. It cannot be taken, as in the instant case, on the dictation of an officer superior to the AO.

The Hon’ble High Court held that the impugned withholding certificate which directed TDS to be deducted at 5% on the payments made by the Indian entities to the Petitioner was unsustainable in law, inasmuch as it was not based on valid reasons and is contrary to the legal requirement spelt out in Section 197(1) of the Act read with Rule 28AA.

Accordingly, the impugned certificate was quashed and the Hon’ble High Court directed AO to once again consider the application made by the Petitioner for issuance of a lower withholding certificate under Section 197(1) of the Act afresh in accordance with law.

Download Full Judgment Click Here >>

• Addition u/s 68 deleted as AO failed to find any discrepancy in details submitted
• Jharkhand Rajya Gramin Bank-Empanelment of retired officers as Concurrent auditors
• Book Profit u/s 115JB can not be computed as per cash basis of accounting
• Order not in conformity of Faceless Assessment Scheme if not est? – ITAT remands case
• Extension of the validity of FCRA registration certificates till 30.09.2024

addition u/s 68 ca misconduct cash deposit in bank cbdt circular CBDT Instruction cbdt notification cbdt order cbdt press release cgst circular cgst notification cit revision 263 concealment penalty covid-19 custom circular demonetisation due date extension e-way bill faq GST circular GST Council Meeting gst faq gstn advisory gstr-1 GSTR-3B GST rates IBBI ibc icai announcement itat mca circular MCA notification order u/s 119 penalty 271(1)(c) penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Press Release reasons recorded reopening 148 Reopening us 147 Search & Seizure sebi circular sebi regulations transfer and postings unexplained cash credits validity of notice u/s 148 Withdrawal of 2000 500 Bank Notes