Category: Judgments
Back dated seizure order under GST Act quashed by the High Court as e-Way Bill was downloaded and produced before the Assistant Commissioner before the date fixed for reply ABCAUS Case Law Citation: BCAUS 2277 (2018) (04) HC The petitioner was a registered proprietorship firm engaged in trading of …
Repeated purchase of same scrip and immediate sale on daily basis to take advantage of the market fluctuations was business income not short term capital gains u/s 111A- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2276 (2018) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT vs. …
Roads and common facilities area in land development agreement also part of assessee’s share in land for capital gain purpose and had to be in the same ratio-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2275 (2018) (04) ITAT The Assessing Officer (AO) had the information that the assessee and …
Order of prosecution for TDS late deposit open to judicial review but in a limited manner to ensure that the authority has acted fairly and reasonably-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2274 (2018) (04) HC The Petitioner company had filed a writ petition against the order passed …
Penalty u/s 271B for sales disclosed during survey can not be levied for failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB when such sales not entered in the regular books of accounts-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2273 (2018) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee had challenged the order of …
Expenses claimed in profit and loss account not amount to concealment. ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1)(c) following Supreme Court judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2272 (2018) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee had challenged the action of CIT(A) on confirming the penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(c) …
For rectification of wrong penalty section no notice u/s 154(3) was required to assessee as he was aware of offence and could not controvert the findings recorded – Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2271 (2018) (04) abcaus.in HC The instant petition was filed under Article 226 …
ICSI should keep uniformity in awarding the punishment for professional misconduct in the interest of justice-Appellate Authority reduces punishment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2270 (2018) (04) AA The appellant in the instant case was a practicing company secretary who was aggrieved of the order passed by the …
Payments by Prasar Bharati to advertising agency liable to TDS as commission u/s 194H. Section 201 rightly invoked for failure to deduct Tax-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2269 (2018) (04) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Jagran Prakashan Ltd vs. Deputy Commissioner of …
PrCIT directed to resolve deposit of TDS into wrong TAN along with Principal Secretary. Income Tax Department directed to release the attached bank account ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2268 (2018) (04) HC A Government Department (The Petitioner) had filed the instant writ petition against the action of …
