Category: Judgments

Arm’s Length Price allowable variation limits u/s 92C notified for AY 2023-24 MINISTRY OF FINANCE(Department of Revenue) Notification No. 46/2023 New Delhi, the 26th June, 2023 INCOME-TAX S.O. 2777(E).—In exercise of the powers conferred by the third proviso to sub-section (2) of section 92C of the Income-tax Act, …

Late Fee u/s 234E deleted as the assessee was a senior citizen and had deposited TDS amount immediately and delay in filing TDS return was on account of human error due to old age In a recent decision, ITAT deleted late fee u/s 234E where the assessee was …

Simply because the overseas employer paid salary into NRE account of the assessee in India, would by itself, not imply that the income is taxable in India In a recent judgment ITAT has held that only because the overseas employer paid salary into NRE account of the assessee …

Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) legally invalid. Intimation u/s 143(1)(a) can not be issued after notice for regular assessment has been issued under section 143(2) ITAT in a recent judgment has confirmed that Intimation issued u/s 143(1) after issue of notice u/s 143(2) …

Compensation to owner of flats for delay in handing over possession to be treated as a part of work-in-progress – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3771 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in National Faceless Appeal Centre …

ITD says mentioning correct contact & email id details in efiling portal is assessee’s mandatory duty. Ignorance of law and process not to be encouraged ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3770 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee was aggrieved by the ex-parte orders of  first appellate …

When examining details, CIT(Appeals) was not clear as to nature then expenses cannot be disallowed by CPC under artificial intelligence – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3769 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the The National Faceless Appeal Centre …

Penalty u/s 271B deleted where accountant handling accounts suddenly left the job but assessee furnished audit report before completion of assessment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3768 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the The National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)/ …

Addition for unexplained cash deleted as assessee consistently declared tuition income and paid tax over 20 -25 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3767 (2023) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made by the Assessing Officer …

Merely because assessee did not filed appeal against addition it cannot be a ground for imposing penalty – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3766 (2023) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Rajiv Kumar Garg vs. ITOCIT vs. Aero Traders (P) Ltd.Harigopal Singh vs. CIT (2002) 258 ITR 85 …