Notice issued u/s 143(2) prior to filing of return of income by the assessee was invalid. Before filing ITR provisions of section 143(2) can not be triggered.  In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that notice issued under section 143(2) of the Act prior to filing of return …

Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes of law. Mere activation of PAN not give right to issue notice to a non-existent entity In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court has held that Order u/s 148A(d) passed against non-existent entity is bad in eyes …

Tax authorities not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that Tax authorities are not bound with provisions of section 44AE of the Act once assessee waived the option available to assess income …

Whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact – High Court In a recent judgment, High Court has held that whether seized document is incriminating or not is definitely a findings of fact. Hard disk was not incriminating documents as its contents were …

Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Guwahati High Court has held that Interest earned on borrowed funds/ unutilized capital subsidy are capital receipts  ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3986 (2024) (04) HC Important Case Laws relied upon:Commissioner of Income …

There is no statutory requirement of pre-deposit for stay of demand under Income Tax Act – High Court stayed demand   In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble High Court has stayed income tax demand and penalty holding that in a situation where serious prejudice may be caused to the …