Tag: deduction u/s 54

When land appurtenant was sold without building, it is not sale of residential property but sale of  adjacent land and not qualified for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 In a recent judgment ITAT Allahabad upheld denial of exemption under section 54 holding that …

AO directed to allow exemption u/s 54 if assessee was entitled to it where assessee claimed deduction u/s 54F and was not entitled to it. In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur directed Assessing Officer to allow alternative claim of exemption u/s 54 of the Act instead of section …

Two flats on two different floors not a single dwelling unit – ITAT rejects exemption u/s 54 In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has rejected the claim of capital gain exemption u/s 54 holding that two flats on two different floors can not be considered as a single …

When assessee himself declared income as business or profession AO could not be directed to consider claim u/s 54/54F of the Act  In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai held that when assessee himself declared income under the head “business or profession” and no capital gain was declared, no …

No bar under law to claim deduction u/s 54 and u/s 54F simultaneously in respect of the same asset – ITAT  In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has held that there is no bar under law to claim deduction u/s 54 and u/s 54F simultaneously in respect of …

Expenses for making house habitable are not renovation expenses and hence qualified for exemption u/s 54 In a recent order, the ITAT Delhi has held that when house was purchased in inhabitable condition and expenditure was necessary for the proper electrification, water facilities, wood work, glass work, etc.. …

Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 wrongly claimed under section 54F allowed being bonafide typographical mistake ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3739 (2023) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:ITO v Anirudh Ashok JajooShrikar Hotels (P.) Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Income-tax 79 taxmann.com 63Commissioner of Income-tax vs. Natraj Stationery Products …

Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 and 54F for investment in residential house limited to Rs. 10 crores Section 54 and section 54F of the Income-tax, 1961 allows deduction on the Capital gains arising from the transfer of long-term capital asset if an assessee, within a period of one …

Deduction u/s 54. Assessee cannot be blamed for the delay in housing projects by the builder as sections 54 and 54F are beneficial provisions. In a recent judgment, ITAT has held that deduction u/s 54 can not be denied for the delay in housing projects by the builder  …

Sale of property was long term capital gain as assessee held it from the date of advance payment and balance payment was only a follow up action ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3502 (2021) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referredCIT vs A Suresh Rao 223 Taxmann 228 (Kar)Principal …