Tag: notice u/s 143(2)
Reassessment made by issue of notice 143(2) before filing of return of income is invalid and not sustainable in the eyes of law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3394 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Singhad Technical Society 397 ITR 344.Fast Booking (I) Pvt. Ltd. …
challenging service of notice u/s 143(2) is barred by operation of section 292BB as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3384 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Laxman Das Khandelwal, 108 taxmann.com 183 (SC) In the instant case, the …
Reassessment completed without serving notice u/s 143(2) invalid. Issue and service of notice are jurisdictional requirements ABACUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3377 (2020) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Chetan Gupta 382 ITR 613 In the instant case, the assessee had raised additional grounds …
Issuance of notice on wrong address not confers right on the Assessing Officer to get the notice served u/s 143(2) by way of affixation ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3192 (2019) (11) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Madhsy Films P. Ltd. 301 ITR 69 …
Notice u/s 143(2) served by affixture at wrong address without independent witness of the locality made it bad in the eyes of law. ITAT allowed appeal of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3176 (2019) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:ACIT Vs. Hotel Blue …
Mere mentioning changed address in return of income (ITR) without intimating AO new address and not getting PAN database changed is not enough – Supreme Court Mere mentioning changed address in ITR not enough ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3175 (2019) (10) SC Important case law relied upon by …
Notice u/s 143(2) issued in the name of dead person, assessment completed in the name of the deceased assessee through legal heirs set aside as invalid ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3174 (2019) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs M HemanathanSavithriammal v. State of …
Requirement u/s 143(2) is of service of notice and not issue of notice. ITAT explains the law on service of notice under Income Tax Act , 1961 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3058 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:V. R. A. Cotton Mills P. …
Notice u/s 143(2) issued by ITO of non jurisdictional ward and consequent assessment framed was invalid and hence both quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2977 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Hindustan Transport Co. vs. Inspecting Assistant Commissioner 189 ITR 326 Abhishek …
Validity of income tax notice served on authorised representative upheld by Supreme Court as there was sufficient material to draw inference of deemed service ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2214 (2018) (02) SC The respondent assessee was Proprietor of a Petrol Pump and was regularly assessed to the …
