Tag: penalty u/s 270A
Penalty u/s 270A(9) deleted by ITAT as assessee pursuant to notice u/s 148 filed return and had paid due taxes In a recent judgment, ITAT Ahmedabad has deleted penalty u/s 270A(9) when assessee pursuant to notice u/s 148 filed return and paid due taxes. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:4395 …
No penalty u/s 270A when disallowances were mentioned in Tax Audit Report but assessee by mistake not added it back to the total income. In a recent judgment, the ITAT Pune held that no penalty u/s 270A can be levied when disallowances u/s 43B were mentioned in Tax …
ITAT deleted penalty u/s 270A observing that law does not bar or prohibit a person from making a claim, when he knows the matter is going to be examined by the Assessing Officer In a recent judgment, the ITAT Hyderabad deleted the penalty u/s 270A observing inter alia …
No under reporting of income if income assessed u/s 143(3) is same as per return processed u/s 143(1)(a) – ITAT In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has held that there is no under reporting of income u/s 270A as income assessed u/s 143(3) and income determined in …
Penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) can not be levied on adhoc additions – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Hyderabad has held that penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) can not be levied on adhoc additions. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 4159 (2024) (07) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the …
Penalty u/s 270A for claiming bogus deductions deleted by ITAT for failure to identify specific Clauses from (a)to (f) of section 270A(9) In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has deleted penalty u/s 270A for claiming bogus deductions for failure to identify in show cause notice the specific clauses …
Penalty order u/s 270A for misreporting without specifying sub-section deleted by ITAT as cryptic and non-maintainable In a recent judgment, the ITAT Pune has deleted penalty u/s 270A for misreporting where AO had not specified sub-section of section of 270A of the Income Tax Act 1961. ABCAUS Case …
Show cause notice for penalty u/s 270A not specifying limb i.e. mis-reporting or under-reporting was bad in law – High Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Delhi High Court has held that show cause notice for penalty u/s 270A not specifying limb i.e. mis-reporting or under-reporting was …
There is no under reporting of income when tax paid u/s 115JB is more than normal tax – ITATÂ In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has deleted penalty u/s 270A(9) holding that there is no underreporting of income when tax is paid on deemed MAT income u/s …
Penalty u/s 270A can not be levied for additions made on estimation basis. Penalty on the basis of findings in quantum proceedings not independently examined can not be sustained – ITAT Bangalore ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3861 (2024) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Jai Balaji …