Tag: prejudice
Non-specific penalty notice u/s 271(1)(c) issued by assessing officer violates mandatory requirement of law and doctrine of prejudice cannot be invoked ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3511 (2021) (06) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Mohd. Farhan A. ShaikhRajesh Kumar v. CIT State of Orissa v. Dr. Binapani Dei Dilip …
No revision u/s 263 without pointing out how assessment order is erroneous. Order quashed as CIT did not mention whether assessee’s contentions were acceptable or not. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2662 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Narayan Tatu Rane vs. ITO reported in (2016) …
The assessee was not prejudiced when AO disallowed only 10% of expenses instead of rejecting the books u/s 145 and pass best judgment assessment order under Section 144- High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2488 (2018) 08 HC The instant appeal was filed by assessee against the …
Revision u/s 263 upheld as AO had not formed any opinion but erroneously allowed the capital expenses as revenue causing a clear prejudice – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2422 (2018) 07 HC The instant appeal was filed by the assesseee against the order of the …