Tag: Section 269SS
Penalty u/s 271D unjustified when bank refused loan and cash was obtained for meeting urgent business expenses as it was a reasonable cause u/s 273B ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2750 (2019) (01) ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was against the order passed by the Commissioner …
Penalty u/s 271D was absurd when assessee himself was karta of HUF from where he obtained cash loan-ITAT deleted penalty for violation of section 269SS ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2749 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Rajendra Suryavanshi Vs ACIT (2011) 141 …
No penalty u/s 271D can be levied when cash loans were treated as undisclosed income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2743 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Diwan Enterprises vs. CIT CIT vs. Standard …
Acceptance of loans by passing journal entries in books of accounts not in violation of section 269SS hence no penalty u/s 271D imposable – SC dismisses SLP of ITD ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2735 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Triumph International Finance (I) Ltd. Premier Breweries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, 372 ITR 180. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. 262 ITR 260 Sunflower Builders Vs. Dy.CIT, 1997 (61) ITD (Pune) 227, Asst.CIT …
No penalty u/s 271D for cash loans taken to meet financial liabilities of a closed business as it constituted a reasonable cause under section 273B – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2727 (2019) (01) ITAT The Assessee hand challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming …
Cash deposited in bank by friend for making DD for participating in tender was not loan or deposits u/s 269SS or 269T- ITAT deleted penalty levied u/s 271D and 271E ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2719 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: OMEC Engineers Vs CIT …
Cash loan from father to son for financial support not covered u/s 269SS. Repayment also not covered u/s 269T-Tribunal deletes penalty u/s 271D and 271E ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2387 (2018) 06 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Anant Himatsingk vs Addl. Commissioner of …
Penalty u/s 271D when claim of cash imprest was sham and facile. The cash was itilised for making fixed deposits in the name of the assessee. High Court remanded case to ITAT The instant appeal was preferred by the Revenue against the order passed by the Income Tax …
Partners capital not loan or deposit within the meaning of section 269SS – ITAT confirms deletion of penalty u/s 271D for capital contributed by partner in cash. The Revenue had filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) whereby he deleted the penalty …
No Violation us 269SS-loan accepted passing journal entries. When the loan is accepted by acknowledgement of debt by passing journal entries in the books of accounts it cannot be considered as acceptance of loan in violation of the provisions of section 269SS of the Act, consequently, no penalty …