Category: Judgments
Registration u/s 80G(5)(vi)-Applicant need not justify taking donations. Receiving fees in cash do not impair charitable character. Approval cannot be denied for contemplating carrying out in the future an activity not as per its stated objects. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2990 (2019) (06) ITAT The present appeal …
No further disallowance when income is computed u/s 44AD. ITAT directs AO to make assessment u/s 44AD as desired by assessee who earlier declared lower net profits ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2989 (2019) (06) ITAT The only issue in this appeal filed by the assessee was against …
ITAT reduced addition u/s 69A for cash deposits in bank by estimating the income assessee might have saved from the past incomes ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2988 (2019) (06) ITAT The appeal was filed by the assessee HUF against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in …
Revision u/s 263 quashed as AO in view the legal position made a conscious decision holding that section 2(22)(e) was not applicable to the case. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2987 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pradip Kumar Malhotra v CIT (2011) …
Hoarding expenses allowed as revenue in nature and not capital. Hoardings are subjected to vagaries of rain, storm, damages etc. and part normal activities of advertisements and publicity business. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2986 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: M/s Empress …
FMV of property on lease to be determined by applying rent capitalization method taking the rent actually received by the assessee and not the fair market rent – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2985 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Kerala v. Hassan Koya, …
Rigorous imprisonment awarded u/s 276B for delayed late deposit of TDS. Assessee had culpable mental state as he remained absent before the authorities and also not filed application for compounding ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2984 (2019) (06) AC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Gopal Engineering V/s …
Addition u/s 40(a)(ia) in rectification proceedings u/s 154 upheld as question of second proviso being prospective was not debatable in view of jurisdiction High Court decision ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2983 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. Ansal Landmark Townships …
Without rejecting books of account, it was not proper to make addition towards unexplained investment u/s 69 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2982 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Smt. P.K. Noorjahan’s (237 ITR 570) w The instant appeal …
Purchasing many small properties itself not good enough reason to hold that it was a business transaction. The quantum or number or number of investments i.e. whether the assessee invested in a single property or in many small properties to get better appreciation, does not change the nature …