Author: administrator
Period of limitation for passing Revisionary order u/s 263 to be reckoned from the date of the original assessment order not reassessment order In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court has held that Period of limitation for passing Revisionary order u/s 263 to be reckoned from the …
Only undisputed tax liability is to be paid before filing appeal to CIT(A)-ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has that objective of section 249(4)(a) is to ensure undisputed tax liability is paid before filing appeal. Self-assessment tax paid as per Return of Income is proper compliance of …
Sanction of Prosecution u/s 276B set aside due to Covid-19 pandemic and TDS being deposited within three months In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Rajasthan High Court has set aside sanction of Prosecution u/s 276B as assessee suffered from Covid-19 pandemic and TDS was deposited within three months with …
Assessee cannot be asked to prove source of cash deposit made in bank account opened by forgery – ITATÂ In a recent judgment, ITAT, Delhi has held that assessee cannot be asked to prove source of cash deposit made in bank account being opened by someone else by …
Expenditure can’t be disallowed because it is not debited in Profit and Loss Account – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Guwahati has held that only because of expenditure not debited in Profit and Loss it does not disentitle assessee to claim deduction of the said expenditure if …
Tax recovery on the basis of wrong computation sheet stayed as tax liability was NIL as per Assessment Order In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Andhra Pradesh High Court stayed recovery of tax on the basis of wrong computation sheet when returned income was accepted and as per …
There is no provision under Income-tax law for making ad-hoc disallowance of sundry creditors – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Surat has quashed ad-hoc addition of creditors holding that there is no provision under Income-tax law for making ad-hoc disallowance of sundry creditors. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS …
In case of non-filer notice u/s 143(2) not mandatory and notice issued u/s 142(1) is sufficient – ITAT In a recent case, the ITAT Guwahati has held that in case of non-filer notice u/s 143(2) not mandatory and notice issued u/s 142(1) is sufficient ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS …
One PAN was allotted to two taxpayers resulting Re-assessment order of wrong person quashed by High Court In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble High Court has quashed a re-assessment order passed u/s 147 on a wrong person because one PAN was allotted by the Department to two taxpayers …
Fixing three successive dates of hearing in a single notice invalid as adjudicating authority had to pass specific orders for adjournment on each date fixed In a recent judgment, the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court has quashed service tax demand and penalty holding that fixing three successive dates for …