Author: administrator

Prosecution u/s 278B without proof of service of notice u/s 2(35) quashed

Prosecution u/s 278B without proof of service of notice u/s 2(35) expressing intention treating a person as Principal Officer of the Company quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2740 (2019) (01) AC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:V.P. Punj Vs. Asstt. CIT, 2001,   119   TAXMAN   543   Delhi,  Sushil Suri and Ors. Vs. State & Ors. (2008) 303 ITR 86 Madhumilan Syntex Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Union of India (SC)Greatway (P) Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Asstt. CIT,  199 ITR 391 (P&C),ITO Vs. Roshini Cold Storage (P) Ltd. and Ors., (2000) 245 ITR 322 (Mad)Income Tax …

Non application of section 56(2)(viia) to fresh issue of shares – CBDT clarifies again

Non application of section 56(2)(viia) to fresh issue of shares contrary to express provisions and legislative intent – CBDT clarifies again Circular No. 03/2019 F.No. 173/616/2018-ITA.IGovernment of IndiaMinistry of FinanceDepartment of Revenue(Central Board of Direct Taxes) North Block, New Delhi,Dated the 21st January, 2019 Subject: Applicability of section …

SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading)  (Amendment) Regulations, 2019

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Prohibition of Insider Trading) (Amendment) Regulations 2019-Member of promoter group to also make disclosure SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION Mumbai, the 21st January, 2019 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA(PROHIBITION OF INSIDER TRADING) (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS, 2019 No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2019/02.─In exercise of …