Category: ITAT
CIT-Appeals is not Assessing Officer hence can not initiate or levy penalty. The enhancement of penalty u/s 271AAA by CIT-A held not sustainable ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2583 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT versus Mrs. Ritu Singhal 403 ITR 97 …
Assessment order u/s 153C will supersede an earlier order passed u/s 143(3). ITAT allowed the additional ground raised and restored the issue to the file of Assessing Officer ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2582 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. Anil …
Non service of notice-affidavit of director cannot be brushed aside lightly. ITAT remands the issue to Assessing Officer to decide afresh ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2581 (2018) (10) ITAT The assessee had filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A) in confirming the disallowance made by the …
Disallowance For prepaid insurance expenses set aside on the principle of consistency where incurrence of expenditure for the purposes of business was not disputed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2580 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: ACIT vs. Shri Satish Sehrawa CIT Vs. …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) when as per the assessment order, the assessee appeared time to time and explained return, furnished documents as requisitioned and case was heard and discussed – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2578 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: …
No concealment penalty based on circumstantial evidence of bogus purchases where the income was estimated on the basis of circumstances brought on record ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2575 Â (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT Vs. Gujarat Ambuja Export Ltd. Sanjay Oilcake …
Alleged gift from foreign citizen on his death held colouring device as it was based upon undated nomination paper not supported with any evidence ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2570 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the …
No Late Fee 234E can be levied when challan cum statement Form 26QB filed within the due date as required u/s 200(3)Â rwr 31A(4A) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2566 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mahavir AGENCY vs. Income Tax OFFICER …
Expecting assessee to submit voluminous details at fag end in a short period of time when AO kept assessment proceedings dormant for one year was unjustified – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2565 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Pr.CIT Vs. Ashokji …
Rejection of books of account for failure to file confirmation from parties not justified. Rejection of a particular expenditure no reason for treating books of account them defective u/s 145(3) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2562 (2018) (10) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT …
