Category: ITAT
It is common practice in Indian household that ladies share locker for keeping jewellery with family members- ITAT deletes addition made without any enquiry ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2718 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Sunita Nigam Vs. DCIT (Central) (2018) 33 ITJ 837 …
No disallowance merely because vouchers was fresh not faded or torn. When self made vouchers not found false, no addition can be made on presumption ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2717 (2019) (01) ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of …
Limitation period not prescribed for service of assessment order but it must be served within reasonable time as held by the various high courts – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2715 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Subrata Roy,(2014(7) TMI42)ACIT Vs. Orissa Stevedores LtdState of …
Transfer of creditor balances to capital account for better bank loan facilities was not waiver of liability u/s 41(1) being without consent form creditors ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2714 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income tax Vs Sugauli Sugar Works (P.) Ltd …
Kind of expenditure a legal professional can legitimately and justly claim is entirely different from basic expenditure a commercial entity can claim – SC dismisses SLP of the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2713 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Shanti Bhushan v. Commissioner of …
For recomputing income correctly u/s 153A no incriminating material necessary and AO can make corrections after giving opportunity to the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2712 (2019) (01) ITAT In this case, the assessee had filed additional ground along with petition for admission of additional ground. The …
Deduction u/s 80IA is mandatory for both assessee and revenue to allow/claim, once initial assessment year is selected as there is no choice for postponement – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2711 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Ramco International reported in 221 …
Penalty proceedings u/s 271D without recording satisfaction in the assessment order held to be illegal following Supreme Court judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2710 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Saini Medical Store, 277 ITR 420 (P&H)CIT Vs. Sunil Kumar Goes, 315 ITR 163 (P&H)CIT …
Addition u/s 69C for unexplained marriage expenses deleted by ITAT noting that in Indian society, family members contribute to wedding in family ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2709 (2019) (01) ITAT The assessee had appealed against the order of the CIT(A) in sustaining the addition made by the …
Restriction that Auditor can not be an accountant to value FMV u/s 56 as provided in Rule 11UA is well founded – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2708 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:M/s. Vaani Estates Pvt. Ltd. Vs. ITO (2018) 172 ITD 629Rameshwaram Strong Glass (P) …
