Category: ITAT
When bank interest was declared in ITR, it cannot be said that bank account was not disclosed to the Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2904 (2019) (05) ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the Assessee against the Order of the CIT(A) on the issue of addition …
Limited scrutiny order passed by AO was not erroneous or prejudicial to the interest of Revenue as enquiries were focused and limited – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2902 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Malabar Industrial Co Ltd Vs. CIT’ (2008) …
Expenditure incurred on discontinued business unless shown to be incurred for reviving it not allowable under section 37(1) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2901 (2019) (05) ITAT The sole issue raised by the assessee was the maintainability of the disallowance of expenditure incurred for maintenance …
Facility service charges apart from house rent taxable as business income. Amount received was for specific services like housekeeping, security, etc. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2900 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Kavita Marketing Pvt. Ltd. vs. ITO (159 ITD 547)/70 taxmann.com …
Cancellation of flat booking held Long Term Capital Gain and deduction u/s 54 allowed. ‘Property’, is a term of widest import and signifying every possible interest which a person can hold or enjoy ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2899 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by …
Disallowance for commission paid on sale of stamp papers partly deleted. It was impractical to maintain record or take receipt many times in a day from each and every person. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2893 (2019) (04) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed …
In the absence of finding as to the year of purchase, jewellery found in locker would not represent the undisclosed income as defined in the explanation to section 271AAB of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2887 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by …
Rectification order u/s 154 quashed due to doctrine of merger. Questions expressly decided by appellate/revisional authority cannot be reagitated u/s 154 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2886 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Rajputana Mining Agencies & others vs ITO (1979) 118 ITR …
Difference in Tribunal and non jurisdictional High Court amounts to two opposite views despite that decision of High Court rendered after ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2884 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Gouli Mahadevappa vs. ITO 356 ITR 90 (Karn) Prakash …
Addition made by AO in limited scrutiny by extending scope deleted as AO did not take due permission to convert it into full scrutiny. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2883 (2019) (04) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the partiesCIT Vs. Mekala Balreddy The appeal in the instant …
