Category: ITAT
Addition deleted for contingent liability stated in tax audit report but which was not debited to the P&L Account In a recent judgment, ITAT Kolkata upheld the order of CIT(A) deleting the addition made by CPC for contingent liability stated in tax audit report but which was not …
Mere failure of partner to respond to notice u/s 133(6) does not ipso facto establish that the capital is unexplained – ITAT upheld deletion of addition u/s 68 In recent case, ITAT Ahmedabad has upheld that the failure of the partner to respond to a notice under section …
Merely because deductor under misconception deducted TDS u/s 194C and 194J, it would not disentitle assessee, benefit under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act. In a recent judgment, The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed the SLP of the Revenue against the the decision of the Delhi High …
Reopening quashed as AO failed to provide all information and relied upon material available alongwith notice u/s 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi quashed notice under section 148 as Assessing Officer failed to comply with the direction given by …
Cash withdrawn from the bank account cannot be considered as unexplained money when the turnover was not disputed – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur deleted addition under section 69A holding that cash withdrawn from the bank account cannot be considered as unexplained money when the turnover …
Real vs. Notional Income has considerable judicial precedents in terms of directing assessment of only real income and not any notional one – ITAT In a recent judgment, Guwahati ITAT deleted addition made by AO for notional interest income on interest free advances by observing that concept of …
Cash Advance received by the assessee and not doubted by AO can’t be rejected as source of cash available for deposits in bank – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Agra held that when Assessing Officer (AO) accepted the advance received from customers in cash as genuine and …
No Penalty can be imposed u/s 270A by AO on the basis of difference in fair market value determined by the DVO on estimation basis with the sale deed price. In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has deleted Penalty under section 270A imposed by AO on the basis …
Past savings can be a valid source of cash deposits unless proven otherwise by the Department – ITAT In a recent judgment, Lucknow ITAT has deleted addition made under section 69 towards cash deposited in bank account holding that past savings can be a valid source of cash …
AO can’t pass order u/s 154 making additions merely on the admission made by the assessee in application submitted before Settlement Commission. In a recent judgment, ITAT Jaipur has held that Assessing Officer (AO) can not pass order u/s 154 for making additions to the income relying on …
