Category: ITAT
ITAT quashed penalty u/s 271AAB for non-mentioning of specific limb in the show cause notice In a recent judgment, Delhi ITAT quashed penalty u/s 271AAB for non-mentioning of specific limb in the show cause notice and following decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court that the construction which is favourable …
Assessee not expected to prove the negative that he has not availed fictitious loan – ITAT In a recent judgment, Chennai ITAT quashed revisionary proceedings u/s 263 holding that assessee cannot be expected to prove the negative that he has not availed fictitious loan in the absence of …
Addition of income or levy of taxes or denial of exemption would be a burden of the Revenue Authority – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Jodhpur while holding that the land was not situated within municipal limits, observed that under the present statutory scheme, it is the …
Revenue cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time-ITAT deleted addition of commission on alleged bogus sale and purchase In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi held that the Revenue cannot approbate and reprobate at the same time and deleted addition of commission on alleged bogus sale and purchase. …
ITAT allows deduction for employment of new workmen u/s 80JJAA by way of submission despite not filing revised return of income. In a recent judgment, ITAT Rajkot has upheld the order of the CIT(A) allowing deduction respect of employment of new workmen u/s. 80JJAA claimed by way of …
Addition u/s 68 for cash collection from exhibition of films in the theaters deleted as the amount was duly recorded in books of account. In a recent judgment, ITAT Chennai has deleted the addition u/s 68 towards cash collection from exhibition of films in the theaters as the …
Revision u/s 263 upheld as AO accepted creditworthiness of lender merely on the basis of acknowledgement of ITRs In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has upheld the revision u/s 263 where Assessing Officer accepted the creditworthiness of the lender merely on the basis of the copies of the …
Delay of 1 and ½ years cannot be considered as inordinate delay unless negligence or want of due diligence on the part of assessee is shown – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Cuttack while condoning the delay in filing appeal observed that delay of 1 and ½ …
Penalty u/s 272A(2)(c) confirmed on Sub Registrar for non compliance of statutory notice u/s 133(6) calling for information of immovable property. In a recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow has confirmed penalty u/s 272A(2)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 levied on the Sub Registrar for non compliance of statutory …
Maintainability of appeal must be decided at the outset not at fag end – ITAT In a recent judgment, ITAT Chandigarh has observed that whether the appeal is maintainable and is filed within the prescribed time limit must be decided at the outset and not at the fag …
