Category: ITAT
For computing allowable partners remuneration u/s 40(b) AO can not allocate net profit into different heads to exclude interest income ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3413 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT V/s J. J. Industries (2013) 358 ITR 531Md. Serajuddin & Bros. vs. …
TDS non deduction by bank where income in Form 15G/15H exceeded threshold limit of basic exemption. ITAT remands case for filing of Form 26A ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3411 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Hindusthan Co-cola Breverages Ltd. Vs. CIT 293 ITR 226 (SC) …
Addition for alleged cash payment based on file/data retrieved from hard disk found during search of third party quashed in absence of corroborative evidence ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3404 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Subhash KhattarArvind Nath Seth & Sons HUFCIT vs. Alpha …
Period of limitation against rectification order can not be counted from the date of assessment order ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3403 (2020) (10) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in dismissing the appeal of the assessee merely on the …
Tax liability of long-term capital gain is not on the power-of-attorney order but on registered owner of the property ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3402 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Suraj Lamps Industries 14 taxmann.com 103 (SC)Seshasayee Steels (P.) Ltd. 115 taxmann.com 5 (SC) …
Addition made on the basis of cancelled money receipt found during search quashed as its contents was not confronted with issuer ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3401 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties: In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed …
Training Expenses on company executive revenue in nature not capital as the workforce can move out any time-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3400 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:ST Ericsson India Pvt. Ltd.CIT vs. Munjal Showa Ltd. In the instant case, the assessee …
Reopening notice u/s 148 quashed as it did not mention source of information or reference to person giving information ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3398 (2020) (10) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Meenakshi Overseas Private LimitedSignature Hotels Pvt. Limited vs ITO Reopening Notice u/s 148 quashed …
Notice u/s 148 for cash deposit after preliminary enquiry was valid as assessee was a non-filer and failed to respond ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3397 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties: Vinod Commodities Ltd. Vs. ACIT (2019) 182 DTR 49 (Jodh) Sh. …
Revision u/s 263 to exclude issues settled in Vivad se Vishvas Scheme 2020. ITAT directs AO not to consider capital gains from penny stock while passing fresh order ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3396 (2020) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Price Water House vs ACIT …