Category: ITAT
ITAT authorised to consider question of jurisdiction raised first time and not raised earlier as it goes to the root of the matter and substantially affects the rights of assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3111 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Thermal Power …
No disallowance for cash payments u/s 40A(3) if genuineness of transactions and identity of the payee is established. ITAT deleted addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3107 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Girdharilal Soni vs. CIT reported in 179 ITR 111 (Cal).Attar Singh Gurmukh …
Reopening for not replying to invalid and non est inquiry letter for cash deposited in bank quashed. Deposit per se cannot be income of assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3106 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Tajendra Kumar Ghai Vs ITO In the instant …
Addition u/s 69B for difference in stock from statement given to Bank deleted as in preceding year it was deleted following High Court judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3105 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Sidhu Rice & General Mills, 281 ITR …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for mere disallowance in quantum proceedings in the absence of any falsity in the explanation offered ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3104 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Reliance Petro Products Pvt. Limited (322 ITR 158) (sc)Price Waterhouse Coopers …
Assessee is eligible for the deduction of the amount embezzled by the employee as a trading loss u/s 28 of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3103 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Dinesh Mills Ltd. 254 ITR 673 The appeal had …
Mere reflection of income in P&L Account does not make it business income. Books of accounts not conclusive evidence to determine income under a particular head ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3102 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Sutlej Cotton Mills Vs. CIT, West Bengal …
Exemption u/s 54F could not be denied for fraud by builder in constructing building without NOC not disclosed to the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3101 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Kanan Chandra Sekhar vs. ITO, 165 ITD 315Dileep Ranjrekar, 101 taxman.com 104Balkishan …
Allowability of Exemption u/s 54 where new residential property used partly for commercial purposes . ITAT remanded case for verification of the proposition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3100 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Seema Sabharwala vs. Income Tax OfficerM. Subramanian vs. DCIT i …
Change of opinion not permissible for invoking proceedings u/s 147. ITAT quashed reassessment for payment of managerial remuneration in proprietorship firm ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3099 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.: 320 ITR 561(SC) The instant appeal …
