Category: ITAT
Concealment penalty deleted for excess salary appearing in Form 26AS on revision by employer. ITAT accepted assessee’s explanation as bonafide & genuine ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3160 (2019) (09) ITAT Concealment penalty for excess salary appearing in Form 26AS In the instant case, the appeal was filed by …
Depreciation rate on printers under Income Tax. Computer peripherals like printers part of computer system & entitled for depreciation at the rate of 60% ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3159 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Vs. Cactus Imaging India Pvt. Ltd.CIT Vs. Bses …
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on disallowance of notional interest on debit balances in capital account of some of the partners deleted as in totality, partners capital had net credit balance. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3158 (2019) (09) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee …
No penalty can be imposed u/s 271(1)(c) on preponderance of probabilities and Revenue has to prove that claim of expenses was not genuine or was inflated to reduce its tax liability ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3157 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Hindustan Steel …
Even in best judgment assessment, AO is required to look into surrounding circumstances, nature of expenditure claimed by other assessees in similar line of business ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3156 (2019) (09) ITAT Even best judgment assessment AO required look into surrounding circumstances In the instant case, appeal …
Penalty 271(1)(c) deleted as employee was misguided by employer cooperative bank that interest income was exempt ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3155 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Badshah Parshad Vs. CIT, 127 ITA 601 (Patna)Rave Entertainment P.Ltd. Vs. CIT, 376 ITR 544 (All)Garden Silk …
An order passed in ignorance of binding precedents is erroneous. ITAT deleted penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when in subsequent year it was deleted on similar facts ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3153 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Reliance Petro Products Pvt Ltd (322 …
TDS payable as at year end is allowable expenditure in cash basis of accounting. it can not be said that the above sum had not been paid by the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3152 (2019) (09) ITAT In the instant case, an appeal was filed by the …
Addition u/s 68 where return is filed under presumptive section 44AF deleted. Addition can not be made based on entries in bank statement ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3150 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT Bihar vs. Bihari Bros (P) Ltd Addition u/s …
Activity of arranging placement for ex-servicemen as security personnel/guards in different organizations was charitable u/s 2(15) of the Income Tax Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3149 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Mfrs. Association 121 ITR 1 …
