Category: ITAT
Forming Opinion on assumption of incorrect facts that income has escaped assessment. Reopening quashed as AO did not verify AIR information before taking any action against the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2505 (2018) 09 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the …
Non furnishing information on apprehension of political misuse. ITAT upheld penalty u/s 272A(1)(c) for non compliance to summons 131(1A) which assessee claimed as purely witch-hunting ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2503 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Jamnadas Madhavji & Co. vs. J.B. …
JDA taxation-no capital gain when possession not handed over to builder and only right to enter the property given to demolish and re-construction ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2498 (2018) 08 ITAT The aforesaid appeal was filed by the assessee against impugned order passed by CIT (Appeals) in …
Concealment penalty for change in method of stock valuation deleted by ITAT. Lower of Cost or market price method was as per ICAI guidelines and was consistently followed thereafter ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2497 (2018) 08 ITAT The aforesaid appeal was filed by the assessee against impugned …
Addition made for low house hold withdrawals from capital upheld by ITAT rejecting the explanation of of joint family living and expenses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2492 (2018) 08 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the order of the CIT(A) in inter …
Booking of flat is not date of acquisition for claim of capital gain exemption u/s 54F. ITAT upheld denial of exemption as asset was not held for more than 3 years ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2490 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: …
Renovation is part of cost of acquisition for grant of benefit of deduction u/s 54F. Term residential house include all amenities to make it habitable-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2489 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mrs. Rahana Siraj Vs. CIT (2015) …
Capital gain Exemption u/s 54 can not be denied for new property purchased in joint names of self wife & daughter when the amount was actually invested-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2481 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT vs. Kamal Wahal (2013) 351 ITR …
Date of Agreement to purchase taken as date of acquisition for grant of exemption u/s 54F. Section 2(47) not stipulates registration as mandatory condition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2480 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Poddar Cement 225 1TR 675 and Mysore Minerals 275ITR 775. …
Procedure for valuation of inventory from tag price during survey u/s 133A-Cost price has to be determined and due deduction to be given towards direct expenses – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2477 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son, …