Category: Judgments
Compensation made to the flat allottees for surrendering rights allowed as business expenditure of the assessee in view of Completed Contract Method of Accounting ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2843 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Shahzada Nand & Sons v. CIT, Patiala …
Lack of full declaration in Form 10 of accumulation u/s 11(2) by itself would not be fatal to the claim. Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2842 (2019) (03) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT v. Hostel and …
Issue of notice u/s 143(2) on the same day return was filed made the entire assessment illegal for being non application of mind by the AO – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2841 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Ashtech Industries Pvt. …
Mere agreeing to increased net profit rate, by itself was no ground to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) when it was already higher compared to preceding assessment years – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2840 (2019) (03) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Harigopal Singh …
Pendency of criminal proceedings u/s 498A of IPC makes a person not fit and proper to become an Insolvency Professional. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2839 (2019) (03) IBBI In the instant case, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI/Board) rejected the application for registration as an …
Transporters/Trucks owners can be proceeded against under UPGST Act despite not doing business in respect of sale/ purchase of goods – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2837 (2019) (03) HC In the instant case, the petitioners were the Truck owners who challenged the individual notices issued …
Section 50C can be applied after claiming exemption u/s 54EC of the Income Tax Act. Any other interpretation would render the provisions redundant – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2836 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. Amarchand N. Shroff, (1963) 48 ITR 59 (SC) CIT Vs. Vadilal Lallubhai (1972) 86 ITR 2 (SC) K.P. …
No deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) when assessee not the beneficial owner of shares. Issue pending before larger bench of Supreme Court was not relevant – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2835 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Universal Medicare National Travel …
Seat of ITAT not AO decides jurisdiction of High Court to which appeal would lie. High Court explains the law on jurisdiction over ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2834 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs. Sahara India Financial Corp. Ltd. …
Amount forfeited on default of installment for purchase of property was capital in nature as the amount was fixed irrespective of which installment the assessee failed to pay – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2833 (2019) (03) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties Commissioner …