Category: Judgments
CIT(A) in cryptic order can not reject reconciliation of difference between gross receipts and Form No. 26AS filed before him on the ground that it did not resolve. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2696 (2019) (01) ITAT The instant appeal by the assessee was directed against the order of …
Eligibility of deemed Exports through third party for deduction u/s 10B-Supreme Court dismisses SLP of the Income Tax Department ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2695 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:M/s. International Stones India Pvt. LtdM/s.Tata Elxsi Ltd. The Karnataka High Court had reiterated that the assessee …
Section 80DD/CBDT Circular not violates right of equality of handicapped person by providing payment of annuity only on death of guardian/parent- Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2694 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:State of U.P. and Another v. Kamla Palace, (2000) 1 SCC 557S.K. Dutta, …
CIT(A) direction to initiate fresh reassessment proceeding after deciding assessee’s objections set aside as reassessment was bad in law ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2692 (2019) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Multiplex Trading & Industrial Co. Ltd. 170 (Delhi). G.K.N Driveshafts (India) Ltd. v. ITO: (2003) …
Execution of sale deed by order of High Court would relate back to the date of original agreement to sale with benefit of cost indexation from said date ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2692 (2019) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:ACIT vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., …
Tribunal, being a fact finding Forum is expected to render its findings on merits instead of dismissing appeal on technical reason like delay, unless it is very huge and without any genuine reason ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2691 (2018) (12) HC The assessee had filed this Appeal under …
Sale of property was not business income when not held as stock in trade neither was related to the business of the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2690 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Venkataswami Naidu & Co. vs. Commissioner of Income Tax 35 ITR …
AO is under obligation to specify the limb of section 271(1)(c) at the time of initiation as well as at the time of levy of penalty. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2689 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Shri Samson PerincheryCIT Vs. Manjunatha Cotton and …
ITR due date extension-Kerala High Court asks assesses to file application u/s 119(2)(a)/119(2)(b), CBDT to hold camps in Kerala to consider them ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2688 (2018) (12) HC The grievance of the petitioners (Alwaye Chartered Accountants’ Association, the lead case) was essentially against the announcement …
CIT is empowered to invoke revisionry powers u/s 263 to direct AO to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2687 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:CIT Vs. Ashok ConstructionsCIT Vs. Surendra Prasad AgarwalV. Ramanamurthy RajuStar Diamond Tools Vs. ITOCIT Vs. Paramanand …