Category: Judgments
Section 14A applies to dividend income u/s 115-O on which tax is paid by the dividend paying company-Supreme Court explains ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1235 (2017) (05) SC The issue: The issue in the present appeal was related to the admissibility or otherwise of deduction of expenditure …
Surety need not be Govt servant, blood relative or local. No property/vehicle papers required. Beggar too qualified if has acceptable residential proof – Madras High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1234 (2017) (05) HC Date/Month of Pronouncement: April, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited relied upon: Maneka Gandhi vs. …
Principles for writing off bad debts u/s 36(2) as laid down by Courts-ITAT explains. Writing off & claiming deduction are two different things and it is not sweet will of the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1233 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved …
Section 271J Penalty challenged in Madras High Court. The Court has accepted the writ petition and the matter is listed for next hearing in July 2017 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1232 (2017) (05) HC Finance Act, 2017 has inserted a new penal provision wef 01/04/2017 namely, section …
Penalty 271(1)(c) Merely if suppliers not traced at given address not indicative of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1231 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) qua confirmation of penalty …
No Penalty 271(1)(c) for disallowance 43B if quantum not disputed and following mercantile accounting it could be debited to Profit and Loss A/c – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1230 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Penalty 271(1)(c) Non-deletion of few words not invalidated notice or caused any prejudice to the assessee when relevant clause was duly ticked-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1229 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) qua confirmation of …
Bogus purchases-when sales not disputed entire addition not warranted. ITAT estimated addition @12.5% of alleged bogus purchases ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1228 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) qua confirmation of addition of bogus purchases to …
Disallowance us 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts paid also-Supreme Court. Allahabad HC judgment holding that it applies to amount payable at the year end overruled ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1227 (2017) (04) SC Date/Month of Pronouncement: May, 2017 The Controversy-Section 40(a)(ia) applies to sums paid or payable? Section …
Revision us 263 set aside as CIT did not do homework. No record was called for examining the issue or application of mind by CIT – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1226 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by …