Category: Judgments
CMA-Writ against 3 years exemption withdrawal in cost accountancy exam dismissed. Amendment to ICMAI Regulation 41(2) not retrospective-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1146 (2017) (02) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: All India Council for Technical Education vs. Surinder Kumar Dhawan & Ors. (2009) 11 SCC 726 …
Advance tax not payable-Income declared after financial year closure. ITAT deleted interest u/s 234B and 234C on income declared in survey ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1145 (2017) (02) ITAT The Ground of Appeal: The only ground that survived for consideration was as under: That CIT(A) erred in …
Rule 8D not applicable to shares held as stock in trade. Calcutta High Court upheld ITAT judgment deleting disallowance made us 14A for interest expenditure ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1144 (2017) (02) HC Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Dhanuka & Sons vs. …
Jurisdiction cannot be conferred even by consent of parties. Acquiescence or any principle of law can not confer legality to such income tax proceedings-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1143 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: In the present case, the order of assessment …
Unreasonable penalty shakes confidence reduces voluntary compliance by the taxpayers. Revenue officials should be careful and reasonable in levying penalty- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1142 (2017) (02) ITAT The Grievance: The present appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(Appeals) sustaining the penalty …
Assessment on the basis of AIR without notice us 143(2) void ab initio without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed, as no notice issued – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1141 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2006-07 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Brief Facts of the …
No concealment penalty without recording findings to bonafide of the explanation offered by the assessee with reasoning. ITAT deletes penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1140 (2017) (02) ITAT The Grievance: The assessee is aggrieved with the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, …
Deemed dividend-share premium not part of accumulated profits. Proportionate taxation u/s 2(22)(e) to be made if more than one shareholder satisfy conditions-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1139 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2009-10 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income …
DG Income Tax-Exemptions action illegal in not taking decision on assessee’s application seeking approval under Section 80 IB(7)(c)-Allahabad HC ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1138 (2017) (02) HC The Substantial Question of Law in assessee’s appeal: Whether the finding recorded by the Tribunal to the effect that after …
No Interference with findings of facts unless relevant evidence not considered or finding arrived by ITAT placing reliance on inadmissible evidence-Allahabad High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1137 (2017) (02) HC Assessment Year : 2009-10 Date/Month of Pronouncement: February, 2017 Brief Facts of the Case: The appeal was admitted by the Lucknow …