Category: Judgments

CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and accounts manipulation which was statutory requirement

CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and accounts manipulation which was statutory requirement

February 9, 2017 High Courts, ICAI, Judgments
CA Misconduct-Non reporting book entry stocks debtors sales and  accounts manipulation. Reporting modus operandi of bogus transactions was statutory requirement-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1120 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) received a …
CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date of cheques encashment-High Court

CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date of cheques encashment-High Court

February 8, 2017 High Courts, ICAI, Judgments
CA misconduct-Share application money receipt fake certificate. CA held guilty for consciously omitting date when the cheques were encashed-High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1119 (2017) (02) HC Brief Facts of the Case: A company invited applications for allotment of 1,80,00,000 preferential shares for cash at par. …
Jurisdictional issue not general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction is questioned it is to be first decided.

Jurisdictional issue not general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction is questioned it is to be first decided.

February 6, 2017 Income Tax, ITAT, Judgments
Jurisdictional issue not general ground requiring no adjudication. Whenever jurisdiction of an authority to pass the order is questioned then the foundational fact questioned is to be first decided-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1118 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2009-10 Date/Month of Judgment/Order: February, 2017 Brief …
Penalty 271(1)(c)-Explanation need not proved completely. As long as the explanation is reasonable and bonafide penalty need not be imposed-ITAT

Penalty 271(1)(c)-Explanation need not proved completely. As long as the explanation is reasonable and bonafide penalty need not be imposed-ITAT

February 5, 2017 Income Tax, ITAT, Judgments
Penalty 271(1)(c)-Explanation need not proved completely. As long as the explanation is reasonable and bonafide penalty need not be imposed-ITAT   ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1116 (2017) (02) ITAT Assessment Year : 2008-09 Date of Pronouncement: 30-01-2017 Brief Facts of the Case: During the assessment, an addition …
Filing adjournment application at closing office hours. CIT(A) was justified in passing ex-parte order upholding penalty u/s 272A(1)(c) – ITAT

Filing adjournment application at closing office hours. CIT(A) was justified in passing ex-parte order upholding penalty u/s 272A(1)(c) – ITAT

January 28, 2017 Income Tax, ITAT, Judgments
Filing adjournment application at closing office hours. CIT(A) was justified in passing ex-parte order upholding penalty u/s 272A(1)(c) – ITAT   ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1111 (2017) (01) ITAT Assessment Year : 2012-13 Date of Pronouncement: 19-01-2017 Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Smt. Rekha Rani Vs. DCIT …