Category: Judgments

Supreme Court upheld Constitutional Validity of various provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2744 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Madras Bar Association v. Union of India, (2015) 8 SCC 583 The Petitioners had challenged the constitutional validity of …

No penalty u/s 271D can be levied when cash loans were treated as undisclosed income of the assessee u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2743 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Diwan Enterprises vs. CIT CIT vs. Standard …

Reopening of assessment for past years on account of the cancellation of Registration u/s 12AA is not permissible unless registration was obtained by fraud, collusion or concealment of any material fact ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2742 (2019) (01) HC The Petitioner had filed the instant Petition against the …

Supreme Court stays arrest of petitioner under GST Act, directs release on bail in the event of arrest  ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2741 (2019) (01) SC The Hon’ble Supreme Court has stayed the arrest of the petitioner under GST Act on the condition that he appears before …

Prosecution u/s 278B without proof of service of notice u/s 2(35) expressing intention treating a person as Principal Officer of the Company quashed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2740 (2019) (01) AC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon:V.P. Punj Vs. Asstt. CIT, 2001,   119   TAXMAN   543   Delhi,  Sushil Suri and Ors. Vs. State & Ors. (2008) 303 ITR 86 Madhumilan Syntex Ltd. and Ors. Vs. Union of India (SC)Greatway (P) Ltd. & Ors. Vs. Asstt. CIT,  199 ITR 391 (P&C),ITO Vs. Roshini Cold Storage (P) Ltd. and Ors., (2000) 245 ITR 322 (Mad)Income Tax …

ITAT analyses validity of notice u/s 143(2) by non jurisdictional AO. On objection, AO obligated to refer matter for determination of jurisdiction u/s 124(2) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2739 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: ACIT Vs. Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362 (SC) …

When assessee during assessment proceedings voluntarily admitted mistake then mere absence of revised return would not justify penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2738 (2019) (01) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT Vs. Man Industries Ltd.(2018) 164 DTR (Bom) 165 CIT Vs. Somany Evergreen Knits …

For discrepancy in salary figure between Form No. 16 and 26AS it cannot be said that the assessee has concealed amount or furnished inaccurate particulars of income – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2737 (2019) (01) ITAT During scrutiny proceedings u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, …

Revised computation of deduction u/s 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 permissible having regard to Section 10A (5) and Section 80A(5) of the Act ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2736 (2019) (01) HC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Goetze (India) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2006) …

Acceptance of loans by passing journal entries in books of accounts not in violation of section 269SS hence no penalty u/s 271D imposable – SC dismisses SLP of  ITD ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2735 (2019) (01) SC Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Triumph International Finance (I) Ltd. Premier Breweries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of  Income Tax, 372 ITR 180. Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Noida Toll Bridge Co. Ltd. 262 ITR 260 Sunflower Builders Vs. Dy.CIT, 1997 (61) ITD (Pune) 227,  Asst.CIT …