Category: Judgments
Section 14A applies to dividend income u/s 115-O on which tax is paid by the dividend paying company-Supreme Court explains ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1235 (2017) (05) SC The issue: The issue in the present appeal was related to the admissibility or otherwise of deduction of expenditure …
Surety need not be Govt servant, blood relative or local. No property/vehicle papers required. Beggar too qualified if has acceptable residential proof – Madras High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1234 (2017) (05) HC Date/Month of Pronouncement:Â April, 2017 Important Case Laws Cited relied upon: Maneka Gandhi vs. …
Principles for writing off bad debts u/s 36(2) as laid down by Courts-ITAT explains. Writing off & claiming deduction are two different things and it is not sweet will of the assessee. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1233 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance:The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the …
Penalty 271(1)(c) Merely if suppliers not traced at given address not indicative of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1231 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) qua confirmation of penalty …
No Penalty 271(1)(c) for disallowance 43B if quantum not disputed and following mercantile accounting it could be debited to Profit and Loss A/c – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1230 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) …
Penalty 271(1)(c) Non-deletion of few words not invalidated notice or caused any prejudice to the assessee when relevant clause was duly ticked-ITATÂ ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1229 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) qua confirmation of …
Bogus purchases-when sales not disputed entire addition not warranted. ITAT estimated addition @12.5% of alleged bogus purchases ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1228 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by the CIT(A) qua confirmation of addition of bogus purchases to …
Disallowance us 40(a)(ia) applies to amounts paid also-Supreme Court. Allahabad HC judgment holding that it applies to amount payable at the year end overruled ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1227 (2017) (04) SC Date/Month of Pronouncement: May, 2017 The Controversy-Section 40(a)(ia) applies to sums paid or payable? Section …
Revision us 263 set aside as CIT did not do homework. No record was called for examining the issue or application of mind by CIT – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1226 (2017) (04) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order passed by …
Subrata Roy ready to go to Jail if cheques dishonours Recently, Supreme Court had ordered auction of Sahara Aamby Valley and warned Subrata Roy to be present in the Court on 27th April, 2017 not to honour his affidavit or face wrath of Law. On the scheduled day, …
