Category: Judgments
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on filing revised return when no such questionnaire was issued with notice u/s 143(2) ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3463 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. SSA’s Emerald MeadowsPr. CIT vs. Sahara India Life Insurance Company Ltd.ITO vs. Sitashri Trading & Finance …
Harish Salve gets relief from ITAT. Funding education of Indian law students abroad allowed as business expenditure u/s 37(1) as goodwill measure ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3462 (2021) (03) ITAT In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming disallowance of …
IBC is special statute, must prevail over Companies Act 2013. Section 7 IBC Petition maintainable post admission of winding up Petition – SC ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3461 (2021) (03) SC Important case law relied referred:Action Ispat and Power Pvt. Ltd. vs Shyam Metalics and Energy Ltd. 2020 …
Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) for non deduction of TDS on amount credited to Provision account deleted by High Court on principles of consistency ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3460 (2021) (02) HC Important case law relied referred:Bharat earth movers vs. CIT (2000) 245 ITR 428 (SC)Parashuram Pottery Works Co. Ltd. …
Transfer of jurisdiction u/s 127 upheld as partnership firm was required to disclose residence of its partners ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3459 (2021) (02) HC Important case law relied referred:Kishore Samrite Vs. State of U.P. (2013) 2 SCC 398Pannalal Binjraj vs. Union of India (1957) 31 ITR 565 …
Partners salary revised just before end of financial year allowed being in accordance with terms of deed and law ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3458 (2021) (02) ITAT In the instant case, the appellant assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming addition made by the …
Addition u/s 69 for unexplained cash deleted by the Tribunal. It was held that tag of another bank found on cash bundles not to be given weightage as it is a common practice amongst banks to issue currency bundles as received by them ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3457 …
Supreme Court fixes banks liability on locker operation. Banks cannot wash off hands and claim no liability towards their customers–Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3456 (2021) (02) SC Important case law relied referred:UCO Bank v. RG Srivastava 1996 (1) CPR 97Charan Singh v. Healing Touch Hospital & …
STamp duty valuation not a relevant criteria to decide payment of on-money by assessee but piece of evidence to ascertain correct facts with regard to value of property ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3455 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:ShyamKumar vs. ACIT (2018) 99 Taxman.com 39Pullongode Rubber …
Education cess is an allowable expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act 1961. ITAT allows deduction on the basis of CBDT circular and PAN India judgments ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3450 (2021) (02) ITAT Important case law relied referred:National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. vs CIT (1998) …