Category: Judgments
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) merely due to quantum addition without making fresh verification during penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3299 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Textiles Vs. CIT 249 ITR 125. The issue involved in this case was related to penalty …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on cancellation of automatic deduction u/s 24(a) on wrong classification of income under house property than other sources ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3298 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. 322 ITR 158CIT vs. Sambhav …
Expenses incurred during lull business period can not be denied to assessee when he was not able to generate any income. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3297 (2020) (04) ITAT In this case appeals had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the separate orders of the …
Doctors / medical staff being first line of defence to combat COVID-19 have to be protected by providing PPE. Supreme Court directions to Government ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3296 (2020) (04) SC The directions have been issued in pursuance of a Public Interest The Hon’ble Supreme Court have …
Trust set up for providing benefits to a particular community no ground to deny Section 12AA registration ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3295 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Leuva Patel Seva Samaj TrustM/s Ananda Social & Educational Trust In this case, the appellant assessee …
Withdrawal of deduction u/s 54/54F beyond scope of rectification u/s 154. AO has no jurisdiction to re-appreciate evidences already considered. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3294 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:T.S. Balaram, Income Tax Officer vs Volkart Brothers & Ors, 82 ITR 50 …
Assessee must be put to notice of all provisions on which revenue relies upon. Supreme Court quashed reopening notice u/s 148 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3293 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Claggett Brachi Co. Ltd. London 1989 Supp(2) SCC 182M/s Phool Chand Bajrang …
Exemption u/s 54/54F for house purchased in wife name, Deduction allowed for change in jurisdictional High Court with favourable judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3292 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT, Faridabad vs Dinesh VermaCIT vs., Kamal Wahal 351 ITR4CIT vs. Ravinder Kumar …
Additional Tax u/s 1431A can be levied on attempt to evade tax lawfully payable not bonafide mistakes. Purpose and object of enacting Statue cannot be lost sight – SC ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3291 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income Tax, …
Beneficiary of a statutory welfare scheme is entitled to remedies under the Consumer Protection Act. Public accountability is a significant consideration which underlies the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3290 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Bihar School …