Category: Judgments
ITAT warns CIT(A) of penalty for not-passing speaking order on merit due to non appearance or non prosecution ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3240 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, an appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax . It …
TDS deposited electronically within due time date shown on OLTAS irrelevant. There is no provision of waiver of interest for late deposit of TDS ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3239 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:In the instant case, an appeal was filed by …
Backward area declared u/s 80HH(2) do not apply to section 80-IA(2)(iv)(c) as both sections are separate and have independent provisions ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3238 (2020) (01) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Ace multi axes systems limited’, (2017) 88 taxmann.com 69 (SC).Commissioner of Income Tax …
Sales of entire year could not be estimated based on cash found during survey. By no means it could be considered as sale of day ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3237 (2020) (01) ITAT In this case the appeal was filed at the behest of the assessee against the …
Reopening quashed as AO not recorded reasons of assesse’s failure to disclose material facts fully and truly but notice u/s 148 was issued on change of opinion ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3236 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Sadbhav Engineering Ltd. vs. DCITCIT Vs. …
Appeal not allowable against computer extract of demand raised by CPC-TDS at traces website. Assessee granted liberty to file appeal after obtaining order ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3235 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Rajesh KouraniM/s. Asan Memorial Association In the instant case, the …
High Court condemns GST officials staying 8 days at searched residential house, says such action punishable with three years jail term under IPC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3234 (2020) (01) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Income Tax Officer v. Seth Brothers, (1969) 74 ITR 836 (SC)Dr. Nand Lal Tahiliani v. Commissioner of …
Addition u/s 69 for unexplained investment on reasoning that no prudent person would keep huge amount of cash in house. ITAT deleted addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3233 (2020) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the …
Section 68 not applicable to sales receipt shown in books of accounts. A Receipt can not be treated sale proceeds & unexplained cash credit simultaneously. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3232 (2020) (01) ITAT In this case, appeal had been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the …
Belief of income escapement must indicate income escaping assessment than need of probe which may, or may not, lead to income escaping assessment. Reopening to verify source of cash deposits in bank is no requisite satisfaction ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3231 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied …