Category: Supreme Court
Quantum addition for unexplained cash credits u/s 68 quashed by the Supreme Court based on the findings of penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3300 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Maddi Sudarsanam Oil Mills Co. v. Commissioner of IncomeTax,Commissioner of Income Tax v. …
Doctors / medical staff being first line of defence to combat COVID-19 have to be protected by providing PPE. Supreme Court directions to Government ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3296 (2020) (04) SC The directions have been issued in pursuance of a Public Interest The Hon’ble Supreme Court have …
Assessee must be put to notice of all provisions on which revenue relies upon. Supreme Court quashed reopening notice u/s 148 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3293 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Claggett Brachi Co. Ltd. London 1989 Supp(2) SCC 182M/s Phool Chand Bajrang …
Additional Tax u/s 1431A can be levied on attempt to evade tax lawfully payable not bonafide mistakes. Purpose and object of enacting Statue cannot be lost sight – SC ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3291 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income Tax, …
Beneficiary of a statutory welfare scheme is entitled to remedies under the Consumer Protection Act. Public accountability is a significant consideration which underlies the provisions of the Consumer Protection Act 1986 ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3290 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Bihar School …
Organisations with no active politics cannot be denied access to foreign contributions. Legitimate means of dissent like bandh, hartal etc. no ground to ban from receiving foreign contribution ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3287 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:A. Abbas v. Union of …
Deduction 80IA allowed on conversion of partnership firm into company under Part IX of Companies Act 1956. Supreme Court upheld HC Order ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3286 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Giridhar G. Yadalam vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax & Anr (2015) …
Where AO of searched person and other person same, there can be one satisfaction note prepared by the Assessing Officer (AO) – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3285 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income Tax v. Calcutta Knitwears (2014) 6 …
To obtain Judicial information through mechanism provided under High Court Rules, provisions of RTI Act not apply ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3283 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Central Public Information Officer, Supreme Court of India v. Subhash Chandra Agrawal 2019 (16) SCALE 40Raj …
High Court has no power to waive pre deposit for entertaining appeal before DRAT as mandated by Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3282 (2020) (03) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Narayan Chandra Ghosh vs. UCO Bank& Ors. …