Category: Supreme Court

Writ court justified interfering with disciplinary enquiry-orders for violation of natural justice, non-application of mind, non-recording of reasons-SC

Writ court justified interfering with disciplinary enquiry and orders if it suffers from violation of  principles of natural justice or exhibit non-application of mind or non-recording of reasons by the Enquiry Officer or the Disciplinary Authority-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1094 (2017) (01) SC Important Case …

Stage of deduction us 10A is at gross total income computation under Chapter IV, not at computation of total income under Chapter VI-SC

Stage of deduction us 10A is at gross total income computation of eligible undertaking under Chapter IV, not at computation of total income under Chapter VI-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1093 (2017) (01) SC Important Case Laws cited: Tata Power Co. Ltd. vs. Reliance Energy Ltd …

Person with disabilities need not stand-up for National Anthem. Doors of Cinema Halls need not be bolted-Supreme Court modifies its order

Person with disabilities need not stand-up for National Anthem. Doors of Cinema Halls need not be bolted-Supreme Court modifies its order. ABCAUS case Law Citation: 1079 (2016)(12) SC On 30th November-2016, The Hon’ble Supreme Court had as interim measure, issued several directions with respect to playing of National …

Exemption us 10(19A) apply to whole palace including let out part and not confined to portion only in Rulers actual occupation-Supreme Court

Exemption us 10(19A) apply to whole palace including let out part and not confined only to portion in actual occupation of Ruler-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1075 (2016) (12) SC Assessment Year: 1978-79  Important Case Laws cited: Maharawal Laxman Singh vs. C.I.T. C.I.T. vs. H.H. Maharao …

Offer Period under SEBI Takeover Regulations commencement date is from the date of concluded share purchase agreement-SC

Offer Period under SEBI Takeover Regulations commencement date is from the date of concluded share purchase agreement for violation u/s 22(7)-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1071 (2016) (12) SC The Grievance: In the present case, SEBI had challenged order of the Securities Appellate Tribunal reversing the …