Category: Supreme Court

Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 4 years before

Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) is illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 and 4 years have lapsed. Soon after the demonetization, the Income Tax Department (‘Department’) had launched a scheme called “operation Clean money” for online verification of cash deposits in …

Misconduct by CA who surrendered COP-Supreme Court dismisses ICAI appeal. Practicing CA holding COP would be liable for punishment if misconduct is proved

Misconduct by CA who surrendered COP-Supreme Court dismisses ICAI appeal. Practicing CA holding COP would be liable for punishment if misconduct is proved. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1147 (2017) (02) SC Brief Facts of the Case: The Hon’ble Madhya Pradesh High Court in 2007 had held that …

Gratuitous passengers-Insurance claim pay and recover principle. Insurance Company first to pay award to victims then recover it from vehicle’s owner-SC

Gratuitous passengers-Insurance claim pay and recover principle. Insurance  Company first to pay award to victims then recover it from vehicle’s owner-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1136 (2017) (02) SC Question for determination: Whether the appellants were entitled for an order against the Insurer of the offending …