CBIC issues eight circulars clarifying GST related issues
CBIC has issued circulars clarifying various issues i.e. taxability of inter state services, e-invoice, refunds, taxability of share capital in subsidiary, ITC in respect of warranty replacement, TCS liability under Sec 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 in case of multiple E-commerce Operators, difference in ITC availed in FORM GSTR-3B vis-a-vis GSTR-2A for 01.04.2019 to 31.12.2021, charging of interest in cases of wrong availment of IGST credit and reversal thereof.
|
Circular No.
|
Date
|
Nature of Clarification
|
|
|
199/11/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification regarding taxability of services provided by an office of an organisation in one State to the office of that organisation in another State, both being distinct persons
|
|
|
198/10/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification on issue pertaining to e-invoice
|
|
|
197/09/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification on refund-related issues
|
|
|
196/08/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification on taxability of share capital held in subsidiary company by the parent company
|
Download >> |
|
195/07/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification on availability of ITC in respect of warranty replacement of parts and repair services during warranty period
|
|
|
194/06/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification on TCS liability under Sec 52 of the CGST Act, 2017 in case of multiple E-commerce Operators in one transaction
|
|
|
193/05/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification to deal with difference in Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed in FORM GSTR-3B as compared to that detailed in FORM GSTR-2A for the period 01.04.2019 to 31.12.2021
|
|
|
192/04/2023-GST
|
17-Jul-2023
|
Clarification on charging of interest under section 50(3) of the CGST Act, 2017, in cases of wrong availment of IGST credit and reversal thereof.
|
- Jewellery purportedly received from grandparent under Will added as unexplained credits
- SC lays down tests to determine if a debt is financial debt or operational under IBC
- Commonality of directors of companies does not mean deposits received was bogus
- Application though named as rectification but if tax is not legitimate, it also touches merit: HC
- Cost of acquisition as on 01.04.1981 taken as per valuer report by reverse indexing of FMV
