Category: Income Tax

Unless it is shown that money withdrawn from bank was utilized for some other purpose, no addition can be made merely because there was a time gap between a withdrawal and re-deposit of money In a recent judgment, the ITAT Allahabad has held that unless the Revenue can …

CBDT extends the due date of filing of ITRs for AY 2025-26 from 31.07.2025 to 15.09.2025 CBDT extends the due date of filing of ITRs for AY 2025-26 to 15.09.2025 for the class of assessees for which the due date for filing return of income was 31st July …

Onus lies on assessee to prove amount received from clients towards expenses were actually expended for the purpose intended. In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi has upheld that for amount received from clients towards expenses reimbursement, onus lies on assessee to prove that the expenses were wholly …

ITAT deleted addition u/s 68 in the case of Mrs Swapna Roy wife of deceased Subrata Roy of Sahara India for cash deposited in bank account In a recent judgment, the ITAT Delhi in the case of Mrs Swapna Roy wife of deceased Subrata Roy of Sahara India, …

Assessment order set aside as show cause notice was sent to the chartered accountant of the assessee who neither informed regarding notice nor filed any reply.  In a recent judgment, Karnataka High Court set aside the assessment order as the show cause notice was sent to the chartered …

AO using the terms “underreporting” and “misreporting as a consequence of underreporting” loosely, showed he was unaware of the different connotations and their implications.  In a recent judgment, ITAT Agra has deleted penalty under section 270A observing that the AO apparently used the terms “underreporting” and “misreporting as …

ITAT directs AO to examine claim of deferred revenue expenditure not claimed in profit and loss account In a recent judgment, ITAT Indore has directed AO to examine claim for deduction of expenses treated by assessee as “deferred revenue expenses” in books of account as books entries are …

CPC cannot continue to rectify and re-rectify the intimation under Section 143(1)(a) repeatedly. In a recent judgment Delhi High Court has held that CPC cannot continue to rectify and re-rectify the intimation under Section 143(1)(a) repeatedly. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:4569 (2025) (05) abcaus.in HC In the instant case, …

When land appurtenant was sold without building, it is not sale of residential property but sale of  adjacent land and not qualified for exemption under section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 In a recent judgment ITAT Allahabad upheld denial of exemption under section 54 holding that …

Expenditure over income should have been considered even if the claim of exemption under section 11 was not allowed by CPC – ITAT  In a recent judgment ITAT Guwahati has held that audited income and expenditure account showing net excess expenditure over income should have been considered even …