Category: Judgments
Show Cause Notice, Order and Penalty passed during lockdown period quashed as assessee had no opportunity to explain the case. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3307 (2020) (05) HC In this case, a Petition was been filed by the assessee praying for quashing the order passed by the Income …
Non filing appeal within statutory limitation period not a case of violation of fundamental right, much less statutory or legal right -SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3306 (2020) (05) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Electronics Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Union of India & OrsOil …
Car mattings not classifiable as parts & accessories of motor vehicles. no need to apply common parlance/market test – SC ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3305 (2020) (05) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:CCE vs. Wood Craft Products Ltd. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay-II vs. Sterling …
Cash credit entries in books of a firm, in absence of material to indicate that they were its profits, could not be assessed in the hands of the firm ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3304 (2020) (05) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Deputy Commissioner of Income …
Goods movement under CST terminate when delivery is taken from carrier. There is no concept of constructive delivery-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3303 (2020) (05) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:CTO vs. Bhagwandas & SonsGuljag Industries Limited vs. State of Rajasthan & AnotherArjan …
Witholding / Processing of refund on issue of notice u/s 143(2)-SC explains the Law. From AY 2017-18 onwards, recording of satisfaction must if refund is to be withheld ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3302 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Vaishali Abhimanyu Joshi v. Nanasaheb …
Doctrine of mutuality was vitiated by absence of right to participate in surplus. Supreme Court explains three basic tests to be followed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3301 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Commissioner of Income Tax, Bihar vs. Bankipur Club Ltd.Bangalore Club v. …
Quantum addition for unexplained cash credits u/s 68 quashed by the Supreme Court based on the findings of penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3300 (2020) (04) SC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Maddi Sudarsanam Oil Mills Co. v. Commissioner of IncomeTax,Commissioner of Income Tax v. …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) merely due to quantum addition without making fresh verification during penalty proceedings ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3299 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:National Textiles Vs. CIT 249 ITR 125. The issue involved in this case was related to penalty …
No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on cancellation of automatic deduction u/s 24(a) on wrong classification of income under house property than other sources ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3298 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT vs. Reliance Petroproducts (P) Ltd. 322 ITR 158CIT vs. Sambhav …
