Category: Judgments
Compensation for removing illegal encroachment not liable for TDS u/s 194L/194LA when occupants were not owners of the land on which they had built illegal huts – High Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2513 (2018) 09 HC The Revenue had filed the instant appeal(s) under the Income …
Interest on enhanced compensation for Land Acquisition taxable on accrual basis as per law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2512 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: M/s Rama Bai vs CIT By the instant appeal was filed …
Concealment penalty deleted when income suo moto declared in return filed u/s 148 without the same being brought to its notice by the AO ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2511 (2018) 09 ITAT By the instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner …
Set back to Rahul and Sonia Gandhi on reopening of income tax cases for Young Indian share allotment not disclosed . Delhi High Court dismisses Petitions for non disclosure of taxing event ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2510 (2018) 09 HC By the instant common judgment, the Hon’ble …
Asking details of land improvement cost incurred 25 years ago uncalled for. ITAT allows ad-hoc deduction of 25% of cost of improvement claimed. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2509 (2018) 09 ITAT This appeal was filed by the assessee against the order of CIT(A) confirming disallowance towards cost …
No ad hoc disallowance without pointing out any deficiency in the books of account or vouchers. ITAT deletes the addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2508 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Commissioner of Excess Profits Tax vs. S.R.V.G. Press Co. 42 ITR …
Presiding Officers of DRT entitled to benefit of increased age under section 6 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 – Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2507 (2018) 09 SC Petitioners in the instant petitions were appointed as Presiding Officers of Debt Recovery Tribunal …
CA made a big mistake by withdrawing appeal against the penalty order on winning quantum appeal. CIT(A) was not justified to dismiss appeal as withdrawn and not deciding it on merits – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2506 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the …
Interest u/s 201(1A) chargeable up to date of payment and not upto the date of filing of return of income by the deductees – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2505 (2018) 09 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the Order of the …
Forming Opinion on assumption of incorrect facts that income has escaped assessment. Reopening quashed as AO did not verify AIR information before taking any action against the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2505 (2018) 09 ITAT The instant appeal was filed by the appellant assessee against the …
