Category: Judgments
Rakhi Sawant income tax appeals gets both relief and dismissal from ITAT-dismissal for delay, disallowance us 40(a)(ia) remanded assessee being not covered u/s 44AB ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1037 (2016) (10) ITAT Appeal-1 dismissed for dealy There was a delay of 704 days for filing the appeal. The …
Penalty for late filing TDS return us 272A(2)(k) quashed as accountant had changed during the year and assessee was not aware of the delay. In a latest judgment, ITAT Mumbai quashed the penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) for late filing TDS return quashed as accountant had changed during the year …
Partnership salary allowed in profit loss ratio as per deed. Remuneration clause provided the manner of quantifying as per CBDT Circular No. 739 – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Ctation 1035 (2016)(10) ITAT Important Judgments Cited: Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M/s. DCS International Trading Durga Dass Davki …
No Penalty 271(1)(c) even if quantum proceedings upheld additions. Merely because a bona fide explanation did not find favour, it would not justify the levy of concealment penalty-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1034 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: A search operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, …
Income Tax Department vindictively disallowed agricultural income claim of Jayalalithaa. Sasikala also gets relief from ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1033 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case(s): In both the cases, among other thing, the claim of agricultural income was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) …
No income concealment us 271(1(c) on gift under explanation 5A. NSC declared us 153A was received as inheriting, gift from father, grandfather-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1032 (2016) (10) ITAT Important case law cited: Sheraton Apparels Vs. ACIT (2002) 256 ITR 20 Brief Facts of the Case: The …
Bogus share capital entry to obtain bank loan. Addition made u/s 68 remanded back to verify facts in view of re-casted and revised audited balance sheet and ROC filing-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1031 (2016) (10) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The was a provate limited company …
Section 68 is about satisfaction of AO not CIT us 263 to sit on the judgment of Assessing Officer. Revision order can not be made merely on audit objection basis-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1030 (2016) (10) ITAT Important case Laws cited: CIT v. Sohana Woollen Mills – …
Expenses on issue of shares eligible deduction us 35D. Deduction for payment of bonus to employees eligible u/s 36 and section 43B or 40A(9) does not come into play-Supreme Court ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1029 (2016) (10) SC Assessment Year: 2001-02 Questions of Law framed: Whether expenditure incurred on …
Diary also books of accounts us 44AA. Section does not prescribe books for business but only talks of accounts-documents which may enable AO to adduce true income, penalty u/s 271A deleted by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 1028 (2016) (10) ITAT Assessment Year: 2009-10 and 2010-11 Brief Facts …
