Category: Judgments
Period when reference was made to IAC u/s 144B (now 144BA) to be excluded while computing the period of limitation u/s 153. Section 144B not to apply only in that case where the IAC exercises the powers or performs the functions of an ITO-Supreme Court. Case Law Details: Civil …
Fresh tangible material not required to reopen an assessment where the initially the return of income is processed u/s 143(1) and an intimation is sent to the assessee, the reopening of such assessment requires the AO to form reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment, but such reasons do …
CBDT Instruction 1916 dated 11-05-1994 cbdt-instruction-1916 Jewellery relief is applicable to additions also. This is held by ITAT Delhi taking the pre-dominant view of various High Courts ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 932 2016 (05) ITAT Assessment Year : 2010-11 Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee was subjected …
Jewellery found in daughter-in-law’s bedroom locker of at the time of search u/s 132 can not be added to the assessee’s income when she was having a seperate source of income- ITAT Delhi Case Law Details: ITA No.3763 and 3757/Del/2012 Assessment Year : 2010-11 S.C. Verma vs. ACIT/ACIT vs S.C. Verma Date …
When the assessee claimed exemption on the principle of mutuality in the return of income and the AO also made detailed inquiries on the issue of principle of mutuality and passed the order u/s. 143(3), the revision u/s 263 was bad in Law-ITAT Delhi
Reopening us 147 based on merely tax evasion petition itself bad in law as the AO had not satisfied himself before initiating the proceedings that income of the assessee has escaped assessment. ITAT Delhi Case Details: ITA No.1894/Del./2012 Assessment Year : 2002-03 Ashok Arora vs. ITO Date of Order/Judgment: …
Penalty 2711c Immunity Explanation5A for Belated Return u/s 139(4). Immunity available to assessee who has filed belated return of income u/s 139(4)-held by ITAT Ahmedabad. Case Law Details: IT(SS)A.No.24/RJT/2013 Hitesh Mulchand Doshi (Appellant) vs. ACIT (Respondent) Date of Order/Judgment: 16/05/2016 Important Judgments Cited: ITO Vs. Gope M. Rochlani, …
Reopening us 147 148 invalid if assessee replied questionnaire raising specific queries during original assessment as it would amount to change of opinion-Delhi High Court. Case Law Details: WP(C) 2526/2015 Allied Strips Limited (Petitioner) vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent) Date of Judgment: 12/05/2016 Coram: Justice Sanjeev …
CBDT Instruction No 1-2015 held illegal and quashed by Delhi High Court It further directed that the said instruction shall not be relied upon to deny refunds to the Assessees in whose cases notices might have been issued under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Case Law Details: …
PE under Indo-US DTAA-Adobe India not PE of Adobe Systems USA as agent must have authority to conclude contracts on behalf of the enterprise-Delhi High Court Case Details: WP(C) 2384, 2385, 2390 of 2013 Adobe Systems Incorporated (Petitioner) vs. Assistant Director of Income Tax & Anr (Respondents) Date of …
