Tag: deduction u/s 54F
Benefit of exemption u/s 54F before its amendment can be extended to a residential house purchased outside India. ITAT allowed claim ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3195 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Anurag Pandit The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the …
Exemption u/s 54F could not be denied for fraud by builder in constructing building without NOC not disclosed to the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3101 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Kanan Chandra Sekhar vs. ITO, 165 ITD 315Dileep Ranjrekar, 101 taxman.com 104Balkishan …
Section 54F exemption not require that land on which construction of property is made must be owned by the assessee. Land and super structure are two different assets ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3064 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Shri Ganesh Chawla vs. ACIT …
Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed when he was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to sold house ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2971 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: In this appeal, the assessee had …
Malba charges was rejected as cost of investment for claiming deduction u/s 54F as there was no occasion for purchasing malba – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2728 (2019) (01) ITAT The Assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming in confirming the action …
Section 50C has no application in case the entire net sale consideration has been applied for acquiring the new house – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2686 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: DCIT Vs. Dr.Chalasani Mallikarjuna Rao Gyan Chand Batra Vs. ITO (2010) 6 …
Deduction u/s 54F denied for non deposit in capital gains accounts scheme allowed as investment in flat purchase was made before due date u/s 139(4) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2660 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Xavier J Pulickal vs. DCIT 379 ITR 534 Sunayana …
Section 54F exemption is for cost of new asset, not consideration paid for acquisition. AO was held wrong in holding that expenses were made to make house luxurious and comfortable ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2625 (2018) (11) ITAT The instant judgment was delivered in a batch of …
Renovation is part of cost of acquisition for grant of benefit of deduction u/s 54F. Term residential house include all amenities to make it habitable-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2489 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mrs. Rahana Siraj Vs. CIT (2015) …
Date of Agreement to purchase taken as date of acquisition for grant of exemption u/s 54F. Section 2(47) not stipulates registration as mandatory condition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2480 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Poddar Cement 225 1TR 675 and Mysore Minerals 275ITR 775. …
