Tag: deduction u/s 54F
Exemption u/s 54F allowed as vendor insisted for execution of two sale deeds to avoid TDS as agreement for purchase of property was not disputed ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3319 (2020) (06) ITAT In the instant case, the appeal was filed by the assessee against the order passed …
Withdrawal of deduction u/s 54/54F beyond scope of rectification u/s 154. AO has no jurisdiction to re-appreciate evidences already considered. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3294 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:T.S. Balaram, Income Tax Officer vs Volkart Brothers & Ors, 82 ITR 50 …
Exemption u/s 54/54F for house purchased in wife name, Deduction allowed for change in jurisdictional High Court with favourable judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3292 (2020) (04) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:CIT, Faridabad vs Dinesh VermaCIT vs., Kamal Wahal 351 ITR4CIT vs. Ravinder Kumar …
Addition made in original assessment proceedings u/s 143(3) and deleted by ITAT cannot be made again in assessment proceedings u/s 153A ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3261 (2020) (02) ITAT In the instant case, appeal had been filed by the Assessee against the impugned order passed by Commissioner of …
Benefit of exemption u/s 54F before its amendment can be extended to a residential house purchased outside India. ITAT allowed claim ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3195 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Anurag Pandit The instant appeal was filed by the assessee against the …
Exemption u/s 54F could not be denied for fraud by builder in constructing building without NOC not disclosed to the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3101 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Kanan Chandra Sekhar vs. ITO, 165 ITD 315Dileep Ranjrekar, 101 taxman.com 104Balkishan …
Section 54F exemption not require that land on which construction of property is made must be owned by the assessee. Land and super structure are two different assets ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3064 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:Shri Ganesh Chawla vs. ACIT …
Deduction u/s 54F for house purchased from father in law allowed when he was assessed to long term capital gain with reference to sold house ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2971 (2019) (05) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: In this appeal, the assessee had …
Malba charges was rejected as cost of investment for claiming deduction u/s 54F as there was no occasion for purchasing malba – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2728 (2019) (01) ITAT The Assessee had challenged the order passed by the CIT(A) in confirming in confirming the action …
Section 50C has no application in case the entire net sale consideration has been applied for acquiring the new house – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2686 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: DCIT Vs. Dr.Chalasani Mallikarjuna Rao Gyan Chand Batra Vs. ITO (2010) 6 …