Tag: deduction u/s 54F
Section 54F exemption is for cost of new asset, not consideration paid for acquisition. AO was held wrong in holding that expenses were made to make house luxurious and comfortable ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2625 (2018) (11) ITAT The instant judgment was delivered in a batch of …
Renovation is part of cost of acquisition for grant of benefit of deduction u/s 54F. Term residential house include all amenities to make it habitable-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2489 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: Mrs. Rahana Siraj Vs. CIT (2015) …
Date of Agreement to purchase taken as date of acquisition for grant of exemption u/s 54F. Section 2(47) not stipulates registration as mandatory condition ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2480 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: Poddar Cement 225 1TR 675 and Mysore Minerals 275ITR 775. …
Denial of Section 54F exemption for quoting wrong section without examining merits of deduction claimed-ITAT remands the case to Assessing Officer ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2425 (2018) 07 ITAT The instant appeal had been filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A) upholding the …
Section 54F deduction for construction of additional floor in existing building allowed by ITAT as it was an independent dwelling unit with separate kitchen and electric connection ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2397 (2018) 07 ITAT The appellant assessee had challeneged the order passed by the CIT(A) in upholding …
AO obliged to give eligible deductions when making additions for income not disclosed in return of income-ITAT allowed 54F deduction for sale of property not disclosed in ITR ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2294 (2018) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee had challeneged the order passed by the Commissioner of …
Deduction 54F-House used for commercial activity not counted for limit of one residential house on the date of transfer of the original asset- ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2289 (2018) (04) ITAT The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the order That the CIT(Appeals sustaining the addition made …
Trust is entitled to deduction u/s 54F by fiction of section 161. Deduction can not be denied on the ground that AOP is not a individual or HUF – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1236 (2017) (05) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the …
Sale deed between wife-husband held as colourful device to avoid tax liabilities. Exemption u/s 54F denied on the basis of relinquishment deed by husband-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1088 (2016) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws cited: CIT vs Macdowell Ltd. (SC) CIT vs. T.N. Aravinda Reddy (SC) …
Capital gain deduction us 54 54F allowable for belated returns u/s 139(4). Value of stamp duty authorities us 50C(3) to be adopted if DVO value is more ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 1086 (2016) (12) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case:The assessee was an individual deriving income from business, …
