Tag: disallowance u/s 40A(3)
No disallowance for cash payments u/s 40A(3) if genuineness of transactions and identity of the payee is established. ITAT deleted addition ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3107 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Girdharilal Soni vs. CIT reported in 179 ITR 111 (Cal).Attar Singh Gurmukh …
Merely making cash payments cannot be a ground for disallowance if section 40A(3) not violated or no defects were found in books of accounts/bills & vouchers ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3075 (2019) (07) ITAT The assessee had challenged the order of CIT(A) in sustaining the part disallowance out …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) of payment of partners salary in cash. ITAT remands the case in view of Supreme Court judgment relied upon by the assessee ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3074 (2019) (07) ITAT The appeal filed by the assessee firm was directed against the exparte order of …
On statutory disallowances u/s 40(a)(ia) 40A(3) there cannot be any penalty u/s 271(1)(c) especially when assessee not claimed deduction of these expenses ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 3016 (2019) (06) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory, 359 ITR …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash payment to agents for onward disbursement towards various expenses set aside. ITAT remands case for verification ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2959 (2019) (05) ITAT The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the decision rendered by CIT(A) confirming the addition made by the AO …
No disallowance u/s 40A(3) where payments not claimed as expenditure. ITAT deletes addition as alleged cash payment was made for purchasing fixed assets ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2685 (2018) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: ACIT V/s Jasmine Buildtech (P) Ltd The appeal was filed by …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash payments to wife for house purchase deleted by ITAT when plea of the assessee was not disputed ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2545 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties: CIT vs. Crescent Export Syndicate The case of the …
Section 40A(3) applicable only when payment of expenses is made in cash exceeding specified sum and not to the payment of advances-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2434 (2018) 07 ITAT The Appellant assessee had filed the present appeal against the order passed by CIT(A) inter alia in …
Cash payments for purchase of liquor to government authorized licencee covered by exception provided under Rule 6DD. ITAT deletes addition u/s 40A(3) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2432 (2018) 07 ITAT The Appellant assessee had filed the present appeal against the order passed by CIT(A) inter alia in …
Disallowance 40(A)(3) for cash payment deleted when payee was new. When genuiness of payment not doubted there was every possibility that party refused to cheques / Demand draft – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 2372 (2018) 06 ITAT During the course of the assessment proceedings, the Assessing …
