Tag: disallowance u/s 40A(3)
Cash payments for purchase of liquor to government authorized licencee covered by exception provided under Rule 6DD. ITAT deletes addition u/s 40A(3) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2432 (2018) 07 ITAT The Appellant assessee had filed the present appeal against the order passed by CIT(A) inter alia in …
Disallowance 40(A)(3) for cash payment deleted when payee was new. When genuiness of payment not doubted there was every possibility that party refused to cheques / Demand draft – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 2372 (2018) 06 ITAT During the course of the assessment proceedings, the Assessing …
No disallowance u/s 40A(3) even if aggregate payment exceeds Rs 20000 if payment is made in cash against different bills none exceeding Rs. 20,000/ ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2296 (2018) (04) ITAT Prelude: Finance Act, 2008 made amendment to the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 40A …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash payment to BSNL deleted as BSNL is a State and payments were made for business expediency and were not doubted – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2231 (2018) (03) ITAT Section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) puts an …
Disallowance us 40A(3) when income-profits are estimated. ITAT following Allahabad High Court judgment deletes additions for cash payments u/s 40A(3) ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1154 (2017) (03) ITAT The Ground of Appeal: In the present appeal, the assessee, inter alia raised a ground challenging the order of …
Cash payment disallowance us 40A3 reduced to Rs 10000 in place of existing limit of Rs. 20000/- to a person in a day Budget 2017-18 : Measures to discourage cash transactions The existing provision of sub-section (3) of Section 40A of the Act, provides that any expenditure in …
Disallowance 40A3-two proprietorship concerns of same assessee. In the absence of alleged tax evasion, additions for cash purchases not warranted-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 949 2016 (06) ITAT AY: 2008-09 Important Case Laws/Judgments Cited: Hasanand Pinjomal Vs. CIT 112 ITR 134 Gujarat High Court Smt. Ch. Mangayamma Vs. …
Disallowance u/s 40A(3) for cash payments cannot be made if genuineness not doubted – ITAT INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 102(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2010-11 Rakesh Kumar (Appellant) vs. Asst. CIT (Respondent) Date of Order: 09-03-2016 ORDER PER T. S. KAPOOR (AM): This is an appeal filed by …