Tag: erroneous and prejudicial
Revision u/s 263 on issues not covered under limited scrutiny quashed as AO could not had gone into other issues ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3483 (2021) (04) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Sanjib Kumar KhemkaM/s Chengmari Tea Co. Ltd. In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the …
Inadequate enquiry or insufficient material on record cannot be a ground to invoke powers under Section 263 of the Act ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3406 (2020) (10) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Company vs. CIT 243 ITR 833CIT vs. Max India Ltd. 295 …
CIT should make detailed enquiry at revision stage if he wants to take a different view and give finding how assessment order is erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3264 (2020) (02) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial …
Assessment Order passed several months ahead of deadline without making inquiries/verification is without due application of mind & in avoidable haste making stronger case for revision u/s 263 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3229 (2020) (01) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Deniel Merchants Pvt. Ltd. Vs. …
Revision u/s 263 done on issues not covered under limited scrutiny quashed as AO had already verified those issues for which limited scrutiny was conducted. ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3201 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd., (2000) 243 ITR 83(SC) …
Failure of AO to apply/examine applicability of section 184(5) makes the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3198 (2019) (12) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Mubarak Trading Co. v/s CIT, 174 Taxman 339Mas Properties & Developers v/s …
Principles of law and legal position regarding exercise of revisionary powers u/s 263. ITAT explains the twin conditions as laid down by Supreme Court/ High Courts ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3141 (2019) (09) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT, 243 …
Revision 263 merely for difference in income as per P&L Account & TDS statement quashed as assessment order was not erroneous & prejudicial to Revenue ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3127 (2019) (08) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd-vs-CIT (2000) 243 ITR 83 …
Revision u/s 263 upheld as AO failed to initiate penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) where assessee increased income in revised return filed u/s 148 ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3091 (2019) (07) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties:CIT v. Bhikaji Dadabhai and Co. 42 ITR 123ACIT vs. …
CIT Revision u/s 263 unjustified alleging wiping out income surrendered u/s 133A treating it business income and not separately u/s 69A INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AMRITSAR BENCH; AMRITSAR I.T.A No. 203(Asr)/2014 Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/s Superfine Agro Industries (Appellant) vs. Income Tax Officer (Respondent) Date of Order: 10/03/2016 ORDER PER T. …
