Tag: erroneous and prejudicial
Arbitration award paid by sale of property not cost of improvement – Supreme Court holds assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3699 (2023) (04) SC Important Case Laws relied upon by parties:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. vs. CIT (2000) 2 SCC 718 (2000) 243 ITR …
Revision u/s 263 to make additions substantively instead of protectively not sustainable – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3631 (2023) (01) ITAT In the instant case, the assessment was framed pursuant to search action u/s 132. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions on protective basis in the …
Assessee’s time cannot be taken for granted by Income Tax Department. Assessee can not be made to appear before the tax authorities again and again ABCAUS Case Law Citation ABCAUS 3624 (2022) (12) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon:Alkaben B. Patel vs. ITO43 Taxmann.com 333 (Ahm)Sujatha Ramesh vs. …
Whether AO applied his mind or not is question of fact not law – SC dismisses SLP of Department challenging setting aside of revisionary order passed u/s 263 of the Income Tax Act 1961 ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3621 (2022) (11) SC In the instant case, the Income …
When appeal is pending before CIT(A), revisionary jurisdiction u/s 263 can not be exercised – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3612 (2022) (09) ITAT Important Case Laws relied upon by parties Smt. Renuka Philip vs. ITO 409 ITR 567 (Mad)CIT vs. Vam Resorts and Hotels Pvt. Ltd. 418 …
No revision u/s 263 simply because AO in order did not make an elaborate discussion – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3597 (2022) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referred:Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. 243 ITR 83Gabriel India Ltd 203 ITR 10CIT vs. Anil Kumar reported in 335 ITR …
CIT is required to make enquiries himself to allege assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue u/s 263 ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3596 (2022) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT Vs Jaiswal Motor Finance 141 ITR 706 (All)CIT Vs Metachem Industries 245 ITR …
Invoking Revisionary powers u/s 263 merely on the basis of suspicion not justified. Where AO made necessary inquiry and satisfied itself about explanation offered, revising such order is unjustified – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3591 (2022) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referred:CIT vs. Anil Kumar Sharma …
CIT assuming jurisdiction u/s 263 has no power to direct initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) CIT Revision u/s 263 for AO accepting revised return without initiating penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) quashed by ITAT following jurisdictional High Court order In the instant case, the assessee had challenged the revisionary …
Sale of property was long term capital gain as assessee held it from the date of advance payment and balance payment was only a follow up action ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3502 (2021) (05) ITAT Important case law relied referredCIT vs A Suresh Rao 223 Taxmann 228 (Kar)Principal …
