Tag: erroneous and prejudicial
Merely because the decision of the High Court followed by Ao was sub-judice before the Supreme Court it would not make the assessment order erroneous. In a recent case, the ITAT Mumbai has held that merely because the decision of the High Court was sub-judice before the Hon’ble …
ITAT quashed revision order u/s 263 passed without providing information to assessee and not considering submissions & evidences furnished. In a recent judgment, ITAT Raipur has quashed the revision order passed u/s 263 holding that the PCIT grossly erred in not providing the information or documents used against …
In case of superficial enquiry by AO PCIT may be justified in invocation of revisionary powers u/s 263 but not before making some enquiries – ITAT In A Recent judgment, ITAT Lucknow has held that in absence of findings of Assessing Officer (AO), PCIT may be justified in …
Revision order u/s 263 by PCIT without specifying what information AO had not called – SC declines to interfere with quashing. In a recent case, the Hon’ble Supreme Court declined to interfere with quashing of revision order under section 263 as PCIT did not give any specific finding …
No Revision u/s 263 when AO after careful examination and detail enquiry took a plausible view that the provisions of section 115BBE of the Act are not applicable. In a recent judgment, ITAT Amritsar held that where the Assessing Officer (AO) after careful examination of the submissions made …
Assessee not expected to prove the negative that he has not availed fictitious loan – ITAT In a recent judgment, Chennai ITAT quashed revisionary proceedings u/s 263 holding that assessee cannot be expected to prove the negative that he has not availed fictitious loan in the absence of …
Revision u/s 263 upheld as AO accepted creditworthiness of lender merely on the basis of acknowledgement of ITRs In a recent judgment, ITAT Pune has upheld the revision u/s 263 where Assessing Officer accepted the creditworthiness of the lender merely on the basis of the copies of the …
Revision u/s 263 was correct as AO did not conduct any enquiry to verify if land sold was beyond prescribed Municipal Limits – High Court. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Delhi High Court held that the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) was erroneous in so …
Income surrender during survey on account of low GP rate not taxable to higher tax rate under deeming provisions u/s 115BBE – ITATÂ In a recent judgment, the ITAT Chandigarh has held that mere fact that survey has been carried out on the business premises of the assessee …
Section 263 makes it incumbent to the Pr. CIT to conduct enquiry. In a recent judgment, Hon’ble High Court of Chhattisgarh has held that Section 263 makes it incumbent to the Pr. CIT to conduct enquiry. The reasons for satisfaction or non-satisfaction are required to be recorded. ABCAUS …