Tag: income tax penalty
No penalty u/s 271E where persons are properly identified and transactions are genuine as there can be no attempt to evade tax – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3318 (2020) (06) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:Industrial Enterprises vs. DCIT 73 ITD 252ADIT vs. Kumari …
Penalty notice u/s 271AAB without specifying at what percentage the penalty will be levied makes it defective and invalid and deserved to be quashed-ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3274 (2020) (02) ITAT Important case law relied upon by the parties:DCIT v/s R. ElangovanRavi Mathur vs. DCITPr. CIT vs. …
CA made a big mistake by withdrawing appeal against the penalty order on winning quantum appeal. CIT(A) was not justified to dismiss appeal as withdrawn and not deciding it on merits – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 2506 (2018) 09 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the …
Penalty for late filing TDS return us 272A(2)(k) quashed as accountant had changed during the year and assessee was not aware of the delay. In a latest judgment, ITAT Mumbai quashed the penalty u/s 272A(2)(k) for late filing TDS return quashed as accountant had changed during the year …
Rationalisation of income tax penalty provisions in budget- 2016-17 New section 270A for under-reporting of income from AY 2017-18 Under the existing provisions, income tax penalty on account of concealment of particulars of income or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income is leviable under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax …
No Penalty 271(1)(c) if income offered u/s 132(2) is accepted by Assessing Officer u/s 153A and assessed INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA I.T.A. No. 622/KOL/ 2008 Assessment Year: 2003-2004 Smt. Sarita Mohta……Appellant vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax……..Respondent Date of Order: 04-03-2016 ORDER Per Shri P.M. …
