Tag: Kolkata High Court

Amalgamation order does not take away right of income tax department to proceed against the transferee company, In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court has held that simply because the amalgamation order has been passed, the same does not take away right of the income tax department …

Seizure of jewellery held valid in view of assessee’s failure to substantiate the legitimacy of jewellery, discrepancies in documentation and weight In a recent judgment, Hon’ble Calcutta High Court held that the seizure of the jewellery was valid in view of the assessee’s failure to substantiate the legitimacy …

Calcutta High Court in a recent judgment has held that expenditure incurred for software development was  capital expenditure Case Details: ITA No. 278 OF 2007 Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-III Kolkata Date of Judgment: 18/03/2016 Question of Law: Whether on the facts and in the …

In a recent judgment, Calcutta High Court has held that to claim exemption under section 10(22A), existence of a nexus between the hospital or an institution engaged in any one of the five activities, and the income is essential. Kindly note that the said section 10(22A) has since been …

While reversing order of CIT(A), Tribunal duty bound to examine and discuss reasons given While reversing the order of the CIT(A) the Tribunal is duty bound to examine and discuss the reasons given by the CIT(A) to hold one way or the other and then to dispel those …

Deduction 33AB first allowed from composite income before apportionment under Rule 8(1) between agricultural non-agricultural The deduction u/s 33AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 shall be allowed from the total composite income derived from growing and manufacturing tea and only after such deduction is made, Rule 8(1) shall be …

Assessee entitled to interest u/s 244A(1)(b) for excess payment on self assessment tax-Kolkata HC HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ITA No.526 OF 2004 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA – I Versus BIRLA CORPORATION LIMITED Coram: Hon’ble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Hon’ble Justice Asha Arora Judgment Date: 02-02-2016 GIRISH CHANDRA GUPTA …

Penalty 271(1)(c) interest on income-tax refund not added to income but disclosed in notes to accounts as contingent income HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ITA 291 of 2009 CIT-II Ves.  PILANI INVESTMENT & INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD. Coram: Hon’ble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Hon’ble Justice Asha Arora Date on which Judgment …

Green tea leaves cess allowed on 100 % composite income before applying Income Tax Rule 8D HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA ITA No.269 OF 2009 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA – II Versus M/S MORAN TEA CO. LTD. Coram: Hon’ble Justice Girish Chandra Gupta And Hon’ble Justice Asha Arora Date …