Tag: reopening 148
Reopening for cash deposits for non response to notice u/s 133(6) is illegal where assessment was completed u/s 143(3)/147 and 4 years have lapsed. Soon after the demonetization, the Income Tax Department (‘Department’) had launched a scheme called “operation Clean money” for online verification of cash deposits in …
Additions not related to reasons recorded for reopening not permissible as it was not subject matter of reasons recorded by AO for reopening the assessment – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1183 (2017) (03) ITAT The Grievance: The appellant assessee was aggrieved by the additions made by …
Non-furnishing reopening reasons despite request vitiates the reopening of assessment. Order passed u/s 148 quashed and declared illegal by ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1156 (2017) (03) ITAT Question for determination: Whether non-furnishing of the reasons for reopening, after the specific request for the same is made …
Reassessment notice issued with sanction from JCIT was void as under proviso to sub-section (1) of section 151 sanction was required from CCIT/CIT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1092 (2016) (12) ITAT Assessment Year : 2006-07 Important Case Laws relied upon: CIT VS. SPL’s Siddhartha Ltd. (2012) 345 …
Reopening assessment us 147/148 for verification of details illegal The Assessing Officer merely sought to reopen the assessment for verification of the details, which is not contemplated under section 147 of the Act. This was held by ITAT in a recent judgment. ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 939 2016 …
AO bound to furnish reopening reasons recorded us 147 within a reasonable time for initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147/148 This was held by ITAT in a recent Judgment ABCAUS Case Law Citation: 6611 2016 (06) ITAT Brief Facts of the Case: The assessee filed his return of …
Reopening us 147 148 invalid if assessee replied questionnaire raising specific queries during original assessment as it would amount to change of opinion-Delhi High Court. Case Law Details: WP(C) 2526/2015 Allied Strips Limited (Petitioner) vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (Respondent) Date of Judgment: 12/05/2016 Coram: Justice Sanjeev …
Reopening of a case u/s 147/148, a post mortem exercise of analysing materials produced subsequently will not cure an inherently defective reopening order from invalidity due to non satisfaction of jurisdictional requirement. ITAT Delhi has relied on Delhi High Court judgment and quashed the reassessment proceedings and allowed the legal issue in …
In a recent judgment, ITAT Delhi has stated that a concluded assessment can not be reopening u/s 147/148 based on a retrospective amendment in Law as there could not be any failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts. Case Law Details: ITA Nos. …
Writing “Yes, I am Satisfied” establishes non recording of proper satisfaction/approval before issue of notice u/s 148 No sooner than a week after, holding that merely writing “yes” or “approved” and affixing signature by CIT) was not the required satisfaction (ITA No. 5311/Del/2013 dated 07/04/2016), ITAT delhi Bench …
