Tag: Statement u/s 133A
Income surrendered in relation to hospital building construction by doctor was not unexplained investment u/s 69 liable to higher tax u/s 115BBE – ITAT In a recent judgment ITAT has held that the surrender of income by a practicing doctor towards understatement of hospital construction expenses can not …
Surrender of income due to recovery of documents during survey can not be said to be voluntarily. ITAT upheld penalty u/s 271(1)(c) ABCAUS Case Law CitationABCAUS 3472 (2021) (03) ITAT Important case law relied referred:MAK Data (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2013) 358 ITR 593(SC)Samson Maritime Ltd. 88 taxmann.com …
Evidentiary value of a statement made on oath by the assessee to the income tax authority in survey proceedings u/s 133A of the Income Tax Act-High Court explains ABCAUS Case Law Citation:ABCAUS 3144 (2019) (09) HC Important case law relied upon by the parties:Paul Mathews and Sons v. …
Statement recorded u/s 131 though binds the assessee cannot be independently used for making addition unless corroborated by evidences – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2784 (2019) (02) ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon by the parties CIT Vs M/s. Hotel Meriya ; Produce Co. Ltd. vs …
Procedure for valuation of inventory from tag price during survey u/s 133A-Cost price has to be determined and due deduction to be given towards direct expenses – ITAT ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 2477 (2018) 08 ITAT Important Case Laws Cited/relied upon: CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son, …
Distinction between statements us 132(4) and 133A explained by Delhi High Court. Quashing of reopening of concluded assessments of earlier AYs upheld ABCAUS Case Law Citation: ABCAUS 1264 (2017) (05) HC The Issue: The main contention of the appellant Revenue was that the decision of the Division Bench …
